N. KOTISWAR SINGH, NANI TAGIA
Gouri Goswami Roy, D/o. Late Rukmini Goswami, W/o. Sri Pradip Roy – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India, Rep. By the Secretary to the Govt. Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(N. Kotiswar Singh, J.)
1. Heard Mr. S. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. G. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel, Foreigners Tribunal appearing for respondent Nos.3, 4, 5; Ms. L. Devi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, learned ASGI for respondent No.1; Mr. A. Bhuyan, learned Standing Counsel, ECI appearing for respondent No.2 and Ms. K. Phukan, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam appearing for respondent No.7. Ms. Devi also appears for respondent No.6 as the learned Standing Counsel, NRC.
2. In this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 26.06.2018 passed by the learned Foreigners Tribunal No.8th, Barpeta, Assam in F.T. Cases No.174/17 [IM(D)T Case No.6206/B/98] by which the petitioner was declared a foreigner who entered India (Assam) illegally after 25.03.1971.
3. The petitioner on receipt of summon from the learned Foreigners Tribunal in the aforesaid proceeding appeared before the learned Tribunal and filed her written statement. The petitioner also exhibited a number of documents and examined herself as DW1. She also examined her projected mother as DW2 and the Gaonburah as DW3 to support her claim that she i
Point of Law – Indian Citizenship – State owes an obligation to see that such persons and their descendants who had fled from the then East Pakistan because of religious persecution are not treated a....
The burden of proof on individuals asserting citizenship under Section 9 of the Foreigners' Act, 1946, and the need for documentary evidence and verification of contents to establish citizenship.
The burden of proving citizenship rests exclusively on the individual. Claims require clear, verified documentary evidence establishing a continuous bloodline linkage to an ancestor in the country pr....
Merely because documents were collected by petitioner during pendency of reference, it cannot be a ground to ignore same as documents have to be examined as regards the genuineness, authenticity, rel....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner has successfully proved his Indian citizenship through oral and documentary evidences, and the court applied the principle of p....
A person who is suspected to be an illegal migrant collusively by matching and resembling similarly of names can picked up voter lists of 1966 and 1970 with help of internet communication system by c....
Point of Law : There is a presumption in law that it would be genuine but such presumption has not been disputed nor rebutted. Merely because it was not issued by the Board or Council or University, ....
The burden lies on the petitioner to provide reliable evidence establishing citizenship, which was not met, leading to the declaration of foreign status.
A person shall be deemed to be of an Indian origin, if he, or either of his parents or of any of his grandparents was born in undivided India and as such, these provisions of Section 6A would cover p....
The burden of proof for citizenship lies with the individual, requiring reliable evidence and clear documentation to establish claims.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.