N. KOTISWAR SINGH, NANI TAGIA
Karim Ali – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N. KOTISWAR SINGH, J.
1. Heard Mr. A.R. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. L. Devi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. R.K. Dev Choudhury, learned Asstt. SGI, accepts notice for respondent no. 1; Mr. G. Sarma, learned Special Counsel, F.T., accepts notice for respondent no. 4 and Ms. U. Das, learned Judicial Government Advocate, Assam, accepts notice for respondent nos. 2 and 3.
2. In this petition the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 18/9/2017 passed in F.T. Case No. FT/5/341/MA/16 by the Foreigners Tribunal No. 5th, Goalpara.
3. After a reference was made and notice issued by the Tribunal, the petitioner duly appeared before the Tribunal and filed his written statement and produced a number of documents. The petitioner examined himself as DW-1 and his maternal uncle, namely Maharaj Ali as DW-2, his mother, namely, Kadbhanu Nessa as DW-3 and his younger brother, namely, Abdul Kuddus as DW-4 to substantiate that the petitioner is an Indian and not a foreigner. However, the Tribunal declined to believe the plea of the petitioner, primarily, on the ground that though there is evidence that his father had appeared in the Interme
Bijoy Das vs. Union of India and Others
Md. Abdul Khalique vs. Union of India and Others
Md. Abdul Khalque vs. Union of India
Nur Begum vs. Union of India and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner has successfully proved his Indian citizenship through oral and documentary evidences, and the court applied the principle of p....
A person shall be deemed to be of an Indian origin, if he, or either of his parents or of any of his grandparents was born in undivided India and as such, these provisions of Section 6A would cover p....
Learned Tribunal is required to re-examine the issue by taking into consideration explanation offered by petitioner about discrepancy and pass a fresh opinion as regards citizenship status of petitio....
Illegal immigrant - Declaration as foreigner - petitioner's father and his grandfather were in-possession of certain property in Assam before 1971 - corroborating evidences to show that the petitione....
In citizenship proceedings, the burden of proof lies solely on the individual. Oral testimony of relatives, without corroborating admissible documentary evidence, is insufficient to establish linkage....
The burden of proof lies on the petitioner to establish citizenship, which was not met due to insufficient evidence linking her to her claimed lineage.
The burden lies on the petitioner to provide reliable evidence establishing citizenship, which was not met, leading to the declaration of foreign status.
Point of Law – Indian Citizenship – Proof of - onus is on the procedee to prove that he is not a foreigner but an Indian, the standard of proof is preponderance of probability.
Point of Law – Indian Citizenship – State owes an obligation to see that such persons and their descendants who had fled from the then East Pakistan because of religious persecution are not treated a....
The burden of proof for citizenship lies with the individual, requiring reliable evidence and clear documentation to establish claims.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.