IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, (ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
R.M. Chhaya, Soumitra Saikia, JJ.
Navin Kumar Ray, S/o. Ram Udgar Ray - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam, represented by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Assam – Respondents
WP(C) No.5169 Of 2020, WP(C) No.5248 Of 2020, WP(C) No.28 Of 2021, PIL No.83 Of 2021, WP(C) No.1208 Of 2022, I.A. (Civil) No.1572 Of 2022
Decided On : 21-10-2022
Assam Public Services Combined Competitive Examination (Amendment) Rules, 2019; Assam Public Services Combined Competitive Examination (Amendment) Rules, 2020 – Public Interest Litigation - Language paper in the Combined Competitive Examination – Public interest litigation in service matter is not maintainable - Before confirmation the successful candidates recruited by the respondent authorities shall have to undergo training and departmental examination as provided under Rule 19 thereof. The decision taken by the State Government in granting exemption is in no way violative of the provisions of the Assam Official Language Act, 1960. The Assamese Language Learning Act, 2020 appears in different sphere. (Para 157,158)
Finding of the Court:
Writ petitioner not a candidate but he has posed himself to be an aspirant and thus he is not affected by the decision taken by the State Government to give exemption to all candidates who have appeared in CCE pursuant to the advertisement -None of the candidates who have appeared have come forward with a challenge. Even at the cost of repetition, it deserves to be noted that prior to 2019 amendment in the Rules, no instance has been shown by the petitioners that those candidates appointed without appearing in any qualifying language paper in recruitments done prior to 2019 and 2020 amendment Rules have defaulted in discharging their public duties as civil servants under the State Government as they did not appear in any of the language papers.
Result: Application allowed
JUDGMENT :
INTRODUCTION
1. This bunch of 5(five) petitions raise identical questions as regards the Assam Public Services Combined Competitive Examination (Amendment) Rules, 2019; Assam Public Services Combined Competitive Examination (Amendment) Rules, 2020 and pertains to an advertisement No.8/2020 issued by the Assam Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as “APSC”) and the addendum vide Notification No.58PSC/E-3/2020-2021 dated 08.01.2020.
2. All the matters were heard together. Lead arguments were made in WP(C) No.5169/2020; PIL No.83/2021 and WP(C) No.1208/2022.
3. The main issue as such involved in this bunch of petitions is regarding the language paper in the Combined Competitive Examination (hereinafter described as “CCE” for the sake of brevity) to be conducted by the APSC pursuant to the advertisement in question.
PRAYERS PRAYED FOR IN EACH PETITIONS
4. WP(C) No.5169/2020 is filed by a candidate, who appeared in the written examination conducted by the APSC. The petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:-
N.T. Devin Katti & Ors. -Vs- Karnataka Public Service Commission & Ors.
English Medium Students Parents Association -Vs- State of Karnataka & Ors.
Jagdev Singh Sidhanti -Vs- Pratap Singh Daulta & Ors.
Sarbananda Sonowal -Vs- Union of India & Anr.
Assam Sanmilita Mahasangha & Ors. -Vs- Union of India & Ors.
Dr. Jagadish Saran & Ors. -Vs- Union of India
Ahmedabad St. Xavier’s College Society & Anr. -Vs- State of Gujarat & Anr.
Madan Mohan Sharma & Anr. -Vs- State of Rajasthan & Ors.
State of Bihar & Ors. -Vs- Mithilesh Kumar
Assam Public Service Commission & Ors. -Vs- Pranjal Kumar Sarma & Ors.
B.N. Nagarajan & Ors. -Vs- State of Karnataka & Ors.
V.N. Sunanda Reddy & Ors. -Vs- State of A.P. & Ors.
D.A.V. College, Etc. -Vs- State of Punjab & Ors.
Usha Mehta & Ors. -Vs- State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Jagdev Singh Sidhanti -Vs- Pratap Singh Daulta & Ors.
Namit Sharma -Vs- Union of India
Sunil K.R. Sahastrabudhey -Vs- Director, IIT, Kanpur
Delhi Development Authority & Anr. -Vs- Joint Action Committee, Allottee of SFS Flats & Ors.
Ahmedabad St. Xavier’s College Society & Anr. -Vs- State of Gujarat & Anr.
State of Orisa -Vs- Sudhansu Sekhar Misra & Ors.
Kanhaiya Lal Sethia & Anr. -Vs- Union of India & Anr.
Hindi Hitrakshak Samiti & Ors. -Vs- Union of India & Ors.
Satya Dev Bhagaur & Ors. -Vs- State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware -Vs- State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Dr. B. Singh -Vs- Union of India & Ors.
Janhit Manch -Vs- State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Vishal Ashok Thorat & Ors. -Vs- Rajesh Shrirambapu Fate & Ors.
Janata Dal -Vs- H.S. Chowdhary & Ors.
Jasbhai Motibhai Desai -Vs- Roshan Kumar, Haji Bashir Ahmed & Ors.
State of Uttaranchal -Vs- Balwant Singh Chaufal & Ors.
Union of India -Vs- Pushpa Rani & Ors.
R.K. Garg -Vs- Union of India & Ors.
Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware -Vs- The State of Maharashtra
State of Maharashtra v. Prabhu
A.P. State Financial Corpn. v. GAR Re-Rolling Mills
Point of law: Before confirmation the successful candidates recruited by the respondent authorities shall have to undergo training and departmental examination as provided under Rule 19 thereof.
The requirement of proficiency in Telugu for judicial positions is justified for efficient administration of justice and does not violate constitutional principles of equality.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to intervene in the selection process to rectify irregularities and ensure that only eligible candidates are considered for t....
The court established that modifications to recruitment eligibility conditions did not violate constitutional rights and maintained that merit-based evaluation prevails over qualification type.
Point of Law : If Section 6 of the General Clauses Act had been applied, no doubt, this complaint against the two accused for the offence punishable under R. 132A of the D.I.Rs. could have been insti....
State regulations that exclude candidates from public employment based on regional residency or source of nomination violate the constitutional right to equality, as such classifications lack a ratio....
The examination for the Art Teacher post must be conducted in both English and Telugu as per the notification, ensuring fairness and adherence to procedural guidelines.
Selection process was not culminated with the appointment of candidates and at the time challenge was made, only the select list of candidates recommended by Commission was prepared and no appointmen....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.