SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Gau) 712

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, (ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
R.M. Chhaya, Soumitra Saikia, JJ.
Navin Kumar Ray, S/o. Ram Udgar Ray - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam, represented by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Government of Assam – Respondents
WP(C) No.5169 Of 2020, WP(C) No.5248 Of 2020, WP(C) No.28 Of 2021, PIL No.83 Of 2021, WP(C) No.1208 Of 2022, I.A. (Civil) No.1572 Of 2022
Decided On : 21-10-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. K.N. Choudhury, Sr. Advocate, Mr. N. Gautam, Advocate, Mr. F. Khan, Advocate, Mr. M.K. Sharma, Advocate.
For State Respondents:Mr. D. Saikia, Advocate General, Assam, Ms. R. Barua, Advocate.
For Respondents APSC:Mr. T.J. Mahanta, Sr. SC, APSC, Mr. P.P. Dutta, Advocate, Mr. A. Barua, Advocate.
For Private Respondents:Ms. S. Kemprai, in WP(C) No.28/2021, Mr. V. Rajkhowa, Advocate, in WP(C) No.28/2021

Point of law: Before confirmation the successful candidates recruited by the respondent authorities shall have to undergo training and departmental examination as provided under Rule 19 thereof.

Headnote:

Assam Public Services Combined Competitive Examination (Amendment) Rules, 2019; Assam Public Services Combined Competitive Examination (Amendment) Rules, 2020 – Public Interest Litigation - Language paper in the Combined Competitive Examination – Public interest litigation in service matter is not maintainable - Before confirmation the successful candidates recruited by the respondent authorities shall have to undergo training and departmental examination as provided under Rule 19 thereof. The decision taken by the State Government in granting exemption is in no way violative of the provisions of the Assam Official Language Act, 1960. The Assamese Language Learning Act, 2020 appears in different sphere. (Para 157,158)

Finding of the Court:

Writ petitioner not a candidate but he has posed himself to be an aspirant and thus he is not affected by the decision taken by the State Government to give exemption to all candidates who have appeared in CCE pursuant to the advertisement -None of the candidates who have appeared have come forward with a challenge. Even at the cost of repetition, it deserves to be noted that prior to 2019 amendment in the Rules, no instance has been shown by the petitioners that those candidates appointed without appearing in any qualifying language paper in recruitments done prior to 2019 and 2020 amendment Rules have defaulted in discharging their public duties as civil servants under the State Government as they did not appear in any of the language papers.

Result: Application allowed

JUDGMENT :

INTRODUCTION

1. This bunch of 5(five) petitions raise identical questions as regards the Assam Public Services Combined Competitive Examination (Amendment) Rules, 2019; Assam Public Services Combined Competitive Examination (Amendment) Rules, 2020 and pertains to an advertisement No.8/2020 issued by the Assam Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as “APSC”) and the addendum vide Notification No.58PSC/E-3/2020-2021 dated 08.01.2020.

2. All the matters were heard together. Lead arguments were made in WP(C) No.5169/2020; PIL No.83/2021 and WP(C) No.1208/2022.

3. The main issue as such involved in this bunch of petitions is regarding the language paper in the Combined Competitive Examination (hereinafter described as “CCE” for the sake of brevity) to be conducted by the APSC pursuant to the advertisement in question.

PRAYERS PRAYED FOR IN EACH PETITIONS

4. WP(C) No.5169/2020 is filed by a candidate, who appeared in the written examination conducted by the APSC. The petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:-

    “It is therefore prayed that, in the premises aforesaid, Your Lordship would be pleased to admit this petition, call for the records, Issue Rule, issue notice calling upon the Respondents to show-cause as to (I) why the Assam Public Services Combined Competitive Examination (Amendment) Rules, 2019 i.e., second part of paragraph 1 occurring at i.e., SECTION-II (b) below the heading ‘QUALIFYING PAPERS (in the level of Class X)’ whereby, candidates from Dima Hasao, Karbi Anglong and West Karbi Anglong Districts who have not studied any of the languages viz. Assamese, Bengali and Bodo, are exempted from appearing for the Qualifying Language Paper A which consist of 300 marks and is of 3 Hours duration, be not be set aside and quashed being ultra vires the Constitution of India and/or (II) why the Assam Public Services Combined Competitive Examination (Amendment) Rules, 2020 whereby, candidates from Dima Hasao, Karbi Anglong, West Karbi Anglong, Cachar, Karimganj and Hailakandi, who did not have any of the languages viz. Assamese, Bengali and Bodo, in High School Leaving Certificate Examination were exempted from appearing for the Qualifying Language Paper A which consist of 300 marks and is of 3 Hours duration, being ultra vires the Constitution of India be not set aside and quashed as the same being ultra-vires to the Constitution of India for being violative of Article 14 & Article 16 of the Constitution of India and (III) and consequently, why a Writ in the nature of Mandamus be not issued directing the respondents to cancel, re-call or otherwise forbear from giving effect to POINT NO.7(II)(A)1 of the Advertisement No.08/2020 issued vide No.23PSC/E-3/2020-2021 dated 08/09/2020 and Addendum bearing No.58PSC/E-3/2020-21 dated 08.10.2020 and/or (IV) and consequently, why a Writ in the nature of Certiorari be not issued setting aside and quashing the POINT NO.7(II)(A)1 of the Advertisement No.08/2020 issued vide No.23PSC/E-3/2020-2021 dated 08/09/2020 and Addendum bearing No.58PSC/E-3/2020-21 dated 08.10.2020 and/or (V) why a Writ in the nature of Mandamus be not issued directing the respondent authorities not to create a class within a class by exempting a choosen class of candidates on the basis of residence from taking the Competitive Examination fully and allowing such class of candidates to qualify with lesser marks; AND/OR (VI) Alternatively why writ in the nature of Mandamus be not issued directing the respondent authorities to also exempt the petitioners in tune with POINT NO.7(II)(A)1 of the Advertisement No.08/2020 issued vide No.23PSC/E-3/2020- 2021 dated 08/09/2020 and Addendum bearing No.58PSC/E- 3/2020-21 dated 08.10.2020 although the petitioners are not from and belonging to Dima Hasao, Karbi Anglong, West Karbi Anglong, Cachar, Karimganj and Hailakandi but fall within the same c

                              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                              1
                              2
                              3
                              4
                              5
                              6
                              7
                              8
                              9
                              10
                              11
                              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                              supreme today icon
                              logo-black

                              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                              Please visit our Training & Support
                              Center or Contact Us for assistance

                              qr

                              Scan Me!

                              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                              whatsapp-icon Back to top