IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH), KOHIMA BENCH
ROBIN PHUKAN, J.
Shri Moaakum Pongen, S/o. Late Mayangneken – Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Nagaland, through The Chief Secretary To The Government Of Nagaland, Kohima and 3 Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.56 Of 2021
Decided On : 24-06-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article, 226 – Power of High Courts to issue certain writs – In this writ petition, under Article of Constitution of India, petitioner has prayed for issuing direction to respondent authorities to consider his application for appointment on compassionate ground in terms of Addendum, and in terms of Office Memorandum issued by Government of Nagaland, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department – Held, Aforementioned documents have not been disputed by respondent side – Learned Govt. Advocate submits that she has no objection in event of issuing any direction to respondent authorities to appoint petitioner to any of vacant posts which will be arising – It is an undeniable fact that after death of sole bread winner, members of the family faces acute hardship – Therefore, there should be no delay in appointment on compassionate grounds, as purpose of providing appointment on compassionate ground is to mitigate hardship – Petition disposed.
JUDGMENT :
1. In this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner - Shri Moaakum Pongen has prayed for issuing direction to the respondent authorities to consider his application for appointment on compassionate ground in terms of Addendum, dated 09.04.2019 and in terms of the Office Memorandum No. AR-8/8/78, dated 17.09.2015 issued by the Government of Nagaland, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department (Administrative Reforms Branch), Kohima, Nagaland.
2. The factual background leading to filing of the present petition is briefly stated as under:
3. Being highly aggrieved, the petitioner approached this Court by filing the present petition seeking appropriate relief.
4. The respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4 have filed their affidavit-in-opposition stating that the application of the petitioner was received by the Department on 29.06.2016, and accordingly, the same was included in the list of compassionate appointment applicants, and as per the latest list, the petitioner is still in Serial No. 10, after rectification. It is also stated that the compassionate appointment was made in a chronological order and since there are other applicants above the petitioner, the application of the petitioner could not considered till date. However, the same will be considered when his turn will come.
5. Heard Mr. Moa Jamir, learned counsel for the petitioner, and also heard Ms. Supongmenla Chang, learned Govt. Advocate representing the State respondents.
6. Mr. Jamir, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the father of the petitioner died in harness on 14.03.2016, and immediately thereafter, the petitioner filed one representation for being appointed on compassionate ground in Group-‘C’ post. But, despite lapse of about 6 years, his representation has not been considered by the respondent authorities. Mr. Jamir, further, submits that this Court vide order, dated 21.04.2022, has directed the learned Govt. Advocate, Nagaland, for production of vacancy position in the Department under Group ‘C’ & ‘D’ posts and accordingly, the learned Govt. Advocate has produced the vacancy position before this Court and as per the said list, 13 incumbents of Group ‘C’ & ‘D’ posts, will arise on account of retirement of the incumbents from June, 2022 till September, 2022 and as such, the respondent authorities may be directed to appoint the petitioner in any of the vacancy, which will be arising during the aforesaid period. Referring to
Claimants for compassionate appointment cannot dictate specific post selection; authorities must match the candidate's educational qualifications to available Group-C or Group-D vacancies in accordan....
Compassionate appointment is not a vested right and cannot be claimed after significant delays, as it undermines the urgency intended by the provisions for financial distress relief.
Compassionate appointment is an exception to the general rule and should be made in accordance with the state's policy and eligibility criteria. It is not a matter of right and is intended to enable ....
Compassionate appointment is a concession and should be restricted to genuine cases of penurious circumstances. Efflux of time can be a ground for rejecting the claim.
Compassionate appointment is an exception to the general rule and must be made in accordance with the state's policy and eligibility criteria, considering the financial condition of the deceased empl....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.