IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH, KOHIMA BENCH
Kakheto Sema, J.
Zuchobeni L. Odyuo – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Nagaland, Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary, Dept. Of Health and Family Welfare and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) 255 OF 2018
Decided On : 26-08-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article, 226 – Power of High Courts to issue certain writs – Present writ petition has been filed impugning letter issued by Government of Nagaland, Health & Family Welfare Department, Nagaland, approving appointment of respondent as sweeper at Community Health Centre (CHC), consequent order issued by Directorate of Health & Family Welfare, Nagaland, appointing respondent to post of sweeper at CHC, under establishment of Chief Medical Officer against retirement vacancy – Held, Insofar as appointment of post of sweeper at CHC is concerned, there is no dispute that respondent hails from family of one of landowners who had donated land for the establishment of Administrative Headquarter – It is also not disputed by petitioner as well as by Government respondents that no family members of respondent has at any point of time been appointed to any Grade post for donating land to Government – In view of discussions and observations made above, this Court is of view that there is no merit in writ petition – Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. Limawapang, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Livika, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents No. 1, 2 & 3. Also heard Mr. Taka Masa, learned Sr. counsel for the private respondents No. 4, assisted by Mr. Arenlong, learned counsel.
2. The present writ petition has been filed impugning the letter No. HFW(A)Appt-8/28/2015/298, dated 13/11/2018, issued by the Government of Nagaland, Health & Family Welfare Department, Nagaland, Kohima approving the appointment of the respondent No. 4 as sweeper at Community Health Centre (CHC), Bhandari, Wokha and the consequent order No. DHFW-3/GR-4/WOKHA-APPTT/2017-18/8163-68, dated 15/11/2018, issued by the Directorate of Health & Family Welfare, Nagaland, Kohima appointing the respondent No.4 to the post of sweeper at CHC, Bhandari under the establishment of the Chief Medical Officer against the retirement vacancy of Smti. Nzanmoni Lotha.
3. The case of the petitioner in brief is that late Yisao Odyuo is the landowner where the present Community Health Centre (CHC), Bhandari is located. The land was donated free of cost to the Medical department for the construction of the Health Centre but with an understanding that the landowner and his family will be awarded with contract works and with appointment in service as and when the department was approached. The petitioner’s father is the legitimate son of late Yisao Odyuo and by dint of which the petitioner belongs to the family of landowners.
4. That a vacancy occurred in the post of sweeper at CHC, Bhandari on the retirement of the incumbent Smti. Nzamoni Lotha. Against the resultant vacancy, the respondent No. 2 appointed Shri. Meribemo N. Jami by issuing the order dated 13/08/2014. The petitioner therefore, submitted the application dated 15/10/2015 to the respondent No. 2, through the respondent No.3 objecting to the appointment of Shri. Meribemo N. Jami on the ground that the said person is not a landowner nor hails from Bhandari village and to appoint the petitioner who is the landowner.
5. Consequent to the application submitted by the petitioner, the respondent No.2 wrote the letter dated 04/03/2016 to the respondent No.3 to verify the landownership against CHC, Bhandari in consultation with the Village Council and the landowners of the Bhandari village and to constitute a committee for authentication of landownership and to submit the report to the respondent No.2. The respondent No. 3 accordingly conducted the verification and by the letter dated 09/03/2016 submitted the report to the respondent No.2 recommending the appointment of the petitioner to the post of sweeper on the ground that the petitioner was the sole landowner of CHC, Bhandari Town. Along with the report the respondent No.3 also forwarded the certificates issued in favour of the petitioner by the Senior Medical Officer Bhandari dated 07/03/2016, the Addl. Deputy Commissioner Bhandari dated 07/03/2016, the Head G.B Bhandari Town dated 05/03/2016 and the Head G.B Bhandari village dated 08/03/2016. It is the case of the petitioner that subsequent to the receipt of the report dated 09/03/2016 from the respondent No.3, the service of Shri. Meribemo N. Jami was terminated after due notice.
6. Mr. Limawapang, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No. 2 thereafter, wrote the letter No. DHFW-3/Vacancy/2016/12783, dated 25/03/2017, directing the Chief Medical Officer of the Districts in the State and the Senior Medical Officer of Tseminyu and Pfutesero to constitute the Screening Committee/Selection Board for appointment of Grade-IV post under their respective establishments by adopting the laid down criteria. In compliance to the letter dated 25/03/2017, the respondent No.3 conducted the selection for appointment to Grade-IV in regard to the establishment of the Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Wokha and thereafter, submitted the final selection list to the respondent No.2 vide the letter dated 02/05/2017. In th
A.V Papayya Sastry & Others Versus Govt. of A.P & Others
A petitioner must come to court with clean hands and disclose all material facts; failure to do so can result in dismissal of the claim.
The court affirmed that government employment based on landownership is not guaranteed perpetually and must adhere to existing policies on vacancies.
Employment benefits derived from land donation are not perpetual or hereditary and are exhausted upon the initial appointment. Furthermore, a candidate who participates in a selection process is esto....
The appointment of a public servant based on land ownership is valid if made prior to the enactment of a policy limiting such appointments, which does not have retrospective effect.
Employment benefits based on historical land agreements are governed by current policy and limited in scope, not perpetuity. Additionally, the judiciary is restricted to the pleadings presented and c....
Landowner employment rights are limited to the original appointee and do not extend to descendants, as per government policy.
The court established that the petitioners had no right to claim appointment against the donated land and were not eligible for appointment under the notification dated 05/03/2018.
Appointment based on landownership was limited to the first landowner, confirming no perpetual employment rights for descendants under constitutional provisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.