IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
M/s No. 5 Sonai Nadi Part-III Fishery Co-operative Society Limited – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam – Respondent
Writ Petition (C) No. 8195 of 2017, Writ Petition (C) No. 8674 of 2018
Decided On : 15-06-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Assam Fishery Rules, 1953 - Rule 12 - Assam Co-operative Societies Act, 2007 - Section 29, 39, 41[6], 42[1], 49, [2], 35, [2], 38, 117 and 125 - Settlement of a fishery - Cooperative society - Petitions challenge settlement of a fishery in favour of cooperative society – Officer so appointed, is empowered to perform all functions of Board during said period of ninety days at cost of society - Para 21.
Finding of the Court: There is nothing in Rule 12 of Assam Fishery Rules, 1953 which stipulates that a registered fishery cooperative society comprising of 100% actual fishermen of Scheduled Caste community will not be eligible to participate in a tender system initiated by Government for settlement of a 60% category fishery if such society does not have any Board of Directors at time of submission of its bid - During period of ninety days, that is, from date of automatic dissolution of Board of society and till assumption of office by a duly elected new Board of society after next AGM/Election, there is nothing either in Assam Fishery Rules, 1953 or in Assam Cooperative Societies Act, 2007 which prohibits or debars such a cooperative society from submitting its bid if there is an officer of Cooperation Department appointed under Section 41[6] of 2007 Act to discharge functions, perform duties and exercise powers that are vested in Board of a registered cooperative society - Court has not found any valid reason to hold that bid submitted by respondent society in response to Tender Notice can be held to be defective on that count.
Result: Petitions dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
MANISH CHOUDHURY, J.
1. In both the writ petitions - W.P. (C) No. 8195/2017 and W.P. (C) No. 8674/2018 – preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the main subject-matter of challenge is settlement of a fishery named ‘No. 5 Sonai Nadi Part-III Fishery’ located in Morigaon District in favour of the cooperative society, M/s No. 151/152 Karmari Nandini Meen Samabai Samity, impleaded as party-respondent no. 8 in both the writ petitions (hereinafter referred to as ‘the respondent society’ at places, for easy reference).
2. The Settling Authority i.e. the State Government in the Fishery Department had settled the fishery named No. 5 Sonai Nadi Part-III Fishery, a 60% category fishery, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Fishery’, for short) in favour of the respondent society for a period of 7 (seven) years w.e.f. the date of delivery of possession of the Fishery to the respondent society by an Order of Settlement dated 22.09.2017. Apart from the Order of Settlement dated 22.09.2017, the petitioner society in the writ petition, W.P. (C) No. 8195/2017 has also assailed an Order dated 14.11.2017 passed by the Additional Chief Secretary to the Government of Assam, Fishery Department, whereby, the Representation submitted by the said petitioner society on 03.10.2017 was rejected, thereby, affirming the Order of Settlement dated 22.09.2017. The petitioner society in the writ petition, W.P. (C) No. 8195/2017 has also sought for a direction in the nature of mandamus to settle the Fishery in its favour on the premise that the respondent society’s bid was non-compliant and the petitioner society was the highest eligible bidder in the tender process initiated for settlement of the Fishery by a Tender Notice dated 04.04.2017.
2.1. The petitioner society in the writ petition, W.P. (C) No. 8674/2018 was also a participant in the tender process initiated for settlement of the Fishery by the Tender Notice dated 04.04.2017. In the writ petition, W.P. (C) No. 8674/2018, challenges are also made to the Order of Settlement dated 22.09.2017 and the subsequent Order dated 14.11.2017. A relief in the nature of mandamus is also sought by the said petitioner society as like the petitioner society in the writ petition, W.P. (C) No. 8195/2017.
3. For proper appreciation of the issues raised in these two writ petitions, it is apposite to exposit the necessary facts, in brief, sans the unnecessary details. By the Tender Notice dated 04.04.2017, the Deputy Commissioner, Morigaon as the Tender Inviting Authority invited sealed bids for settlement of the Fishery ‘No. 5 Sonai Nadi Part-III Fishery’ (‘the Fishery’) for a period of 7 (seven) years. The Fishery is a 60% category fishery, which is to be settled in terms of the provisions of the Assam Fishery Rules, 1953. The Tender Notice mentioned that sealed bids would be received at the office of the Tender Inviting Authority i.e. the Deputy Commissioner, Morigaon upto 02-00 p.m., 12.04.2017. As per terms and conditions of the Tender Notice, a number of documents were required to be submitted by the bidders along with their respective bid in sealed form. Amongst the certificates/documents which were required to be submitted along with the sealed bids by a bidder, the documents viz. (i) earnest money in the form of call deposit, amounting to 15% of the annual revenue of the first year as fixed by the Government; (ii) a photocopy of the PAN Card issued from the Income Tax Department and (iii) a Bakijai Clearance Certificate from the office of the Deputy Commissioner; were included. The Tender Notice had further stipulated that the bids could be submitted by a co-operative society comprised of 100% members belonging to Scheduled Caste and actual fisherman and such bidder society should be in the neighbourhood of the Fishery.
4. In response to the Tender Notice dated 04.04.2017, 7 (seven) nos. of
Afcons Infrastructure Limited vs. Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited and Another
Bharat Singh and Others vs. State of Haryana and Others
Brahmaputra Part-II Mach Mahal Samabai Samity Ltd. vs. State of Assam
Enjil Choudhury vs. Assam Fisheries Development Corporation and Others
Gangadhar Fishery Co. Op. Society Ltd. vs. State of Assam and Others
Khoraghat Gulihara Fishery Cooperative Society Limited vs. State of Assam and Others
Majorati Min Samabai Samity Ltd. vs. Sukhraj Min Samabai Samity Ltd. and Others
Malegarh Gobindapur Fishery Cooperative Society vs. State of Assam
Poddar Steel Corporation vs. Ganesh Engineering Works and Others
Rule 12 of Assam Fishery Rules, 1953 has prescribed that a 60% category fishery is to be settled with special category of Cooperative Societies, Non-Government Organisations and Self Help Groups cons....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the settlement process for a fishery must adhere to the requirements specified in the relevant rules and tender notice. The court emphasized t....
The rejection of bids based on conditions not stipulated in the Notice Inviting Tender or the Assam Fishery Rules, 1953 was held to be based on irrelevant considerations. The bids of the Petitioners ....
Co-operative Society’ -It is for the Settling Authority in the Fishery Department, Government of Assam to examine the enforceability of the Notification in the context of its publication or non-publi....
Point of Law : A certificate issued by such an authority carries with it a presumption under Section 114 III.(e) – “That judicial and official acts have been regularly performed.
Order of settlement - Tender Process - The only other valid bidder, Society did not challenge order of settlement - In view of such position, assailment made on aspect of neighbourhood by two petitio....
Point of Law : Settlement process initiated for the settlement of Fishery for a period of 7 [seven] years is required to be brought to a logical conclusion at the earliest for the interest of all con....
Under the powers which can be traced to Regulation 16 and Regulation 155 of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886 read with Section 6 of the Indian Fisheries Act, 1897 that enables a Deputy Com....
It is settled position of law that power of judicial review of administrative action is intended to prevent arbitrariness, irrationality or unreasonableness or bias or mala fide.
The settlement of the fishery was determined based on compliance with tender conditions and the relevant provisions of the Assam Fishery Rules, 1953.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.