MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Jitendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Suresh Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Surendra Prasad Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and Mr. Asheem Mukherjee, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for following relief:
(ii) Issue any other writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
(iii) Award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner.”
3. In the present writ petition, counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged between the parties. Both the parties agree that this petition be disposed of at this stage without calling for any further affidavit.
4. In the present writ petition, the case of the petitioner is that he was pursuing study in Kashi Hindu Vishwavidyalaya, Varanasi and preparing for UGC/NET-2017. In connection with the same, he applied for UG
Bihar Staff Selection Commission vs. Arun Kumar
Chairman, J & K State Board of Education Vs. Fayaz Ahmed
Dr. Umakant Vs. Dr. Bhikha Lal Jain & Ors.
M.S. Gupta etc. Vs. A.K. Gupta & Ors.
Rajendra Prasad Mathur Vs. Karnataka University & Anr.
Ran Vijay Singh and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
State of Bihar & Anr. Vs. Dr. Asis Kumar Mukherjee
State of Orissa & Ors. Vs. Prajnaparamita Samanta & Ors.
The Chancellor & Anr. Vs. Dr. Bijay Nanda Kar & Ors.
The Dental Council of India Vs. Subharti K.K.B. Charitable Trust & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.