Er. K Wati vs State Of Nagaland - 2023 Supreme(Gau) 1068

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Gau) 1068

KAKHETO SEMA, KARDAK ETE
Er. K Wati – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : TONGPOK PONGENER, S REOPI, M. ATHAI, TONGPANG JAMIR, LAKNYEI PHOM, JENDEMO TSANGLAO, AKUM JAMIR

Table of Content
1. unconstitutionality of service rules provisions favoring employment wing. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments against discriminatory provisions. (Para 10 , 12)
3. court observations on classification and administrative discretion. (Para 18 , 20)
4. findings on reasonable classification and legislative competence. (Para 34 , 36)
5. conclusion on dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 68 , 77)

ORDER :

Kardak Ete, J.

Heard Mr. Tongpok Pongener, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. V. Suokhrie, learned Additional AG for the State respondents and also heard Mr. A. Zho, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 5 to 16.

2. By filing this writ petition the petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of that part of the Nagaland Employment & Craftsmen Training Service and Nagaland Subordinate Employment & Craftsmen Training Service Rules, 1998 (herein after referred to as Service Rules, 1998) particularly Schedule-I(A), Schedule-I(B) and Schedule –II (A) Serial No. 1 wherei

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Gau) 1068

KAKHETO SEMA, KARDAK ETEEr. K Wati – AppellantVersusState Of Nagaland – Respondent

Cases Referred (19)

KAKHETO SEMA, KARDAK ETE
Er. K Wati – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland – Respondent