KARDAK ETE
Shri Chandan Rai S/o Sri Biron Ch. Rai – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. H. Bezbaruah, learned counsel for the petitioner and also Mr. H. Gupta, learned CGC appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. By filing this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 29.04.2010, passed by the Commandant 171 Battalion, CRPF (respondent No. 5) whereby the petitioner was dismissed from service and the order dated 16.05.2011 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, CRPF (respondent No. 4) whereby the departmental appeal filed by the petitioner was rejected and prayed for a direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service in Central Reserve Police Force (in short CRPF) as Constable/General Duty with all consequential benefits.
3. The petitioner was recruited in Central Reserve Police Force as Constable/General Duty after having qualified in the recruitment process on 06.07.2004 and he was allotted Force No. 041713063. While the petitioner was serving and posted in 171 Battalion, CRPF, by order dated 25.07.2009 bearing No. P-VIII-13/2009-171-EC-2, the respondent No. 5 placed the petitioner under suspension in contemplation of a disciplinary proceeding.
4.
Punjab National Bank v. Kunj Behari Misra
Ram Charan Vs. IG of Police CRPF and Others reported in (2006) 2 SCC 541
Suresh Koshy George v. University of Kerala
Roop Singh Negi Vs. Punjab National Bank & Ors
S.B.I & Ors Vs. Arvind K Shukla reported in 2004 (13) SCC 797.
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Dayanand Chakrawarty & Ors reported in (2013) 7 SCC 595.
Union of India V. Ram Lakhan Sharma reported in (2018) 7 SCC 670
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.