SUREPALLI NANDA
V. Balaswamy – Appellant
Versus
Government of India – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Solicitor General of India.
2. This writ petition is filed to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the impugned orders passed by the respondents wherein removing the petitioner from service issued in order No.P-XIII-4/2015-EC-II, dated 08.04.2016 by the 5th respondent and its consequential order issued by the 4th respondent in order No. R.XIII-01/2017-Estt-3, dated 10.03.2017 rejecting the appeal submitted by the petitioner and consequential orders No.R.XIII-36/2017-Admn-7, dated 04.12.2017 issued by the 3rd respondent rejecting the revision petition is illegal, arbitrary and consequently set aside the same with a direction to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits.
3. PERUSED THE RECORD.
FACTS NOT IN DISPUTE :
4. The petitioner is removed from service as per Section 11(1) of Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 read with Rule 27 of CRPF Regulations, 1955 vide the Impugned Order No.P-VIII-4/2015-EC-II, dt. 08.04.2016 issued by the 5th Respondent w.e.f. 08.04.2016, only on the ground of unauthorized absence. The 4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.