Back
N. KOTISWAR SINGH, NANI TAGIA
Sital Mandal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court heard arguments from various parties. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments on res judicata and related cases. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. examination of previous rulings. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. details surrounding the abdul kuddus case. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. analysis and findings from earlier cases. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. application of res judicata principles. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. concluding remarks on the case. (Para 20) |
| 8. court's conclusion on several petitions and orders. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
JUDGMENT :
(N. Kotiswar Singh, J.)
1. Heard Mr. B.C. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP(C) No.2099/2018 and WP(C) No.2601/2018; Mr. A.R. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner in WP(C) Nos.4610/2018, 8491/2018, 8493/2018, 822/2019; Mr. F.U. Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner in WP(C) No. 2239/2019; Mr. K.M. Hassan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in WP(C) No. 8189/2019; Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in WP(C) No. 8253/2019 and WP(C) No.3514/2021 and Mr. H. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner in WP(C) No.1816/2020.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
