RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Bhairab Das – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. A. Tiwari, learned Amicus Curiae. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam, representing the State.
2. Facts and circumstances giving rise to the present case is that on 19.05.2009, the victim/daughter of the informant Pradip Das who is a student of Class-IX did not return home after attending school examination, at about 2.30 P.M. Her father/informant made searches of her in the school premises and came to know that the accused petitioner Bhairab Das has abducted the victim girl in a black Indica vehicle and fled away. Immediately after the occurrence, father of the victim lodged an FIR against the petitioner, which was registered as Morigaon P.S. Case No.89/2009 under Sections 366-A IPC.
3. During the course of investigation, victim girl was recovered and her statement was recorded under Sections 161 and 164 CrPC. Medical examination of the victim was done. The accused Bhairab Das surrendered before the court and after completion of the investigation, charge sheet was submitted against the accused petitioner under Sections 366-A/376 IPC.
4. The accused faced the trial an
Jaya Mala vs. Home Secretary, Government of Jammu & Kashmir and Others
Satpal Singh vs. State of Haryana
Anversinh @ Kriansinh Fatesinh Zala vs. State of Gujarat
Md. Abdul Matin Pradhani vs. the State of Assam
Subhash Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan
Parminder Kaur Vs. State of Punjab
Rattan Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Sanatan Naskar and Another vs. State of West Bengal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.