IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
VIJAY BISHNOI, CJ., N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
Abdul Hannan Laskar, S/o- Late Usman Gani Laskar and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Assam, Rep. By The Commissioner And Secretary To The Govt Of Assam, Deptt Of Housing And Urban Affairs and Ors. – Respondents
WA No.371 Of 2024
Decided On : 04-11-2024
(A) Constitution of India - Article 243Q - Assam Municipal Corporation Act, 2022 - Notification dated 28.11.2022 for the constitution of Silchar Municipal Corporation challenged - Petitioners contended non-consideration of objections regarding inclusion of villages Dudpatil Part-VI and Part-VII - Court found no violation of statutory provisions and upheld the notification. (Paras 4, 19)
(B) Judicial Review - The court emphasized that the decision of the learned Single Judge was in accordance with the materials on record and did not warrant interference. (Paras 18, 20)
Facts of the case:
The appellants challenged the notification constituting the Silchar Municipal Corporation, claiming their objections regarding the inclusion of certain villages were not duly considered by the Government.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the objections were considered and rejected as they were without merit, thus upholding the notification.
Issues: Whether the Government duly considered the objections raised by the appellants regarding the inclusion of villages in the Municipal Corporation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Government's actions were in compliance with the statutory provisions, and the objections raised were adequately addressed.
Result: Writ appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
(N. Unni Krishnan Nair, J.)
Heard Mr. H.R.A. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. F. U. Barbhuiya, learned counsel appearing for the appellants. Also heard Mr. D. Saikia, learned Advocate General, Assam assisted by Ms. R. Borah, learned Government Advocate, Assam appearing for the State respondents.
2. The present Intra Court Appeal has been instituted assailing the Judgment & Order dated 24.09.2024, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C)595/2023. The appellants, herein, as petitioners, had instituted WP(C)595/2023 presenting a challenge to a notification dated 28.11.2022, issued by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Assam, Department of Housing and Urban Affairs, constituting the Silchar Municipal Corporation with wards having boundary marks as per Annexure-A to the said notification.
3. The grievance of the petitioners pertains to the inclusion of villages Dudpatil Part-VI and Part-VII in the newly constituted Silchar Municipal Corporation vide the said notification dated 28.11.2022. The learned Single Judge, upon consideration of the issues arising in the writ petition was pleased vide Judgment & Order dated 24.09.2024 to reject the contentions advanced by the appellants herein and proceeded to dismiss the writ petition.
4. Mr. H. R. A. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants has at the outset submitted that the grievance of the appellants pertains to the non-consideration of the objections raised by them vide representation dated 21.10.2022 in the matter by the Government while proceeding to issue the said notification dated 28.11.2022, towards constitution of the Silchar Municipal Corporation by incorporating within its area the villages of Dudpatil Part-VI and Part-VII. Mr. Choudhury has submitted that the notification dated 28.11.2022 was so issued in clear violation of the provisions of Sub Article (2) of Article 243Q of the Constitution of India, as well as the provisions of Sub-Section (4) of Section 3 of the “Assam Municipal Corporation Act, 2022. Mr. Choudhury has submitted that the Government having not granted a independent consideration to the objections raised by the petitioners and others with regard to inclusion of villages Dudpatil Part-VI and Part-VII within the newly constituted Silchar Municipal Corporation, a violation of the provisions of Sub-Section (4) of Section 3 of the said Act of 2022 had occasioned and accordingly, the notification dated 28.11.2022, issued under the provisions of Sub-Section (5) of Section 3 of the said Act of 2022; insofar as, it concerns inclusion of villages Dudpatil Part-VI and Part-VII within the newly constituted Silchar Municipal Corporation would not be maintainable and accordingly, submits that the notification dated 28.11.2022, to the above extent, is required to be interfered with.
5. Mr. H. R. A. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel by referring to the Judgment and Order dated 24.09.2024, passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C)/595/2023 has contended that the learned Single Judge after having noticed the provisions of Section 3 of the said Act of 2022, had failed to consider the contention raised by the appellants to the effect that the representations submitted by the petitioners not having been granted an independent consideration by the Government and the said objections having been disposed of basing on the observations made in the matter by the Deputy Commissioner, a violation of the provisions of Sub-Section (4) of Section 3 of the said Act of 2022 having occasioned, the impugned Judgment & Order dated 24.09.2024 requires an interference by this Court.
6. Mr. D. Saikia, learned Advocate General appearing for the State respondents has submitted that on a decision for constitution of the Silchar Municipal Corporation having been arrived at, upon a due consideration of the criterias as mandated in this connection, under the provisions of Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the said Act of 2022, a not
The court upheld the constitution of Silchar Municipal Corporation, affirming that objections raised were duly considered and found without merit, thus complying with statutory requirements.
The court established that the State Government's consideration of objections under the Assam Municipal Corporation Act, 2022 was sufficient and compliant with legal requirements.
The notifications for municipal formation and alteration complied with constitutional mandates and statutory requirements, and the principles of natural justice were not violated.
The failure to consider objections submitted within the statutory timeframe invalidates the notification regarding the inclusion of a Gram Panchayat in a Nagar Panchayat.
The requirement for a personal hearing is mandatory before altering municipal limits; failure to grant it renders such notices invalid, ensuring adherence to principles of natural justice in administ....
Gram panchayat - Recommendation of specification of village - Petitioner gram panchayats are not entitled to an opportunity of hearing, it cannot be said that no effective consultation was made by re....
The discretionary nature of the State's power in issuing notifications under the Bihar Municipal Act, 2007, and the legislative character of such notifications, as well as the absence of a requiremen....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that Notifications issued under Section 5(1)(B) of the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 must fulfill the requirements of Article 243Q of the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.