MANISH CHOUDHURY
N. Litsemo, S/O Nzinyimo – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India Represented By The Secretary To The Govt. Of India, Ministry Of Home Affairs, North Block, New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is preferred by the petitioner assailing inter-alia an Office Letter dated 22.07.2016 and also his non-selection to the post of Operator Radio Line [ORL] pursuant a Recruitment Rally held in the year 2012 by the respondent Assam Rifles authorities.
2. The petitioner has claimed that he belongs to the Scheduled Tribe [ST] categories and a permanent indigenous inhabitant of Nagaland.
3. It is the case of the petitioner that in the month of October, 2012, an Advertisement was published inviting applications for regular selection and appointment in the posts of Trade -Operator Radio Line [ORL] by the respondent no. 4. As per the said Advertisement, the candidates shall be required to qualify in the Physical Efficiency Test [PET] as per the standards and procedures prescribed by the Assam Rifles Rules, 2010 from time to time therein. It was mentioned in the Advertisement that only those candidates who were found eligible and qualified in the PET, would be called for participating in the Written Test to be conducted by the Selection Committee, duly constituted for the purpose.
4. In response to the said Adver
Cement Workers Association vs. Paper Udyog Ltd. and others
D.K. Reddy and another vs. Union of India and others
Government of Karnataka and others vs. Gowramma and others
Hemani Malhotra vs. High Court of Delhi
Hukan Chand Shayam Lal vs. U.I.O. and others
K. Manjusree vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and another
Karnati Ravi ANR vs. Commissioner Survey Settlements & Land Records and others
Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao vs. Dean, Seth G.S. Medical College and others
Rajesh Awasthi vs. Nandlal Jaishwal and others
Sant Ram Sharma vs. State of Rajasthan and others
State of Maharashtra vs. Milind and others
State of U.P. vs. Singhara Singh and others
Union of India vs. Indo-Afgan Agencies
The court upheld the recruitment process, affirming that mere qualification does not guarantee selection, emphasizing merit-based decisions.
Post of Police constable – Direct recruitment - To lower respective category-wise merit and accord selection to them on the vacant posts of Constable (Civil Police/PAC) – Held, Such situation eventua....
Point of Law : candidates cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time. Either the candidates should not have participated in the interview and challenged the procedure or they should have challen....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the preference indicated by candidates for a particular service is final and candidates can be kept out of consideration for appointment to ot....
In the absence of a specific provision allowing for a second chance for the PET in the recruitment process for Constables, the Court cannot grant such a chance to candidates who missed the PET due to....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.