THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Manoj Kumar Das S/o Lt. Harkumar Das – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam – Respondent
Judgment & Order :
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging, inter alia the rejection of the candidature of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground which has been done by the District Level Committee (hereinafter DLC) in its meeting dated30.01.2014.
2. The projected case of the petitioner, in a nutshell is that his father, Harkumar Das, who was working as Assistant Carpenter in the Office of the Executive Engineer, Irrigation, Rangia Division had died in harness on 11.10.2010. The petitioner who claims to be eligible had applied for appointment on compassionate ground and for a long time was unaware of the outcome of such consideration and accordingly, he had sought information under the RTI Act. Thereafter, he came to know that the District Level Committee (DLC), Kamrup, in its meeting dated 30.01.2014 had recommended the name of the private respondent no. 5 by rejecting the case of the petitioner. It is this action, which is the subject matter of challenge in this writ petition.
3. I have heard Shri A. Sarania, learned counsel for the petitioner. I have also heard the Departmental Counsel and
Compassionate appointments are exceptions to normal recruitment procedures and must be made promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays undermine this objective.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays diminish the urgency of such claims.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; significant delays undermine this purpose.
Compassionate appointment is not a vested right and must be pursued promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays diminish the urgency and relevance of the application.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions to normal recruitment rules, not vested rights, and must satisfy immediate needs without prolonged delays affecting eligibility.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions meant for immediate relief and not vested rights; delays undermine their purpose.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly; significant delays dilute the urgency of financial need.
Compassionate appointment is not a vested right and is meant to address immediate financial crises. The sense of immediacy is diluted and lost in cases of prolonged delay, and compassionate appointme....
Compassionate appointments are intended for immediate relief and cannot be claimed after significant delays, as the sense of urgency is lost.
Compassionate appointments are an exception for immediate support to bereaved families, not a vested right, and must be considered without undue delay to fulfill their intended purpose.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.