IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Dipankar Roy Karmakar S/o Late Dilip Kumar Roy – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
1. The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging, inter alia the non-consideration of the candidature of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground.
2. The projected case of the petitioner, in a nutshell is that his father, Dilip Kumar Roy, who was working as Instructor, Printing Shop of HRH, the Prince of Wales Institute of Engineering and Technology, Jorhat and had died in harness on 05.02.2012. The petitioner, who claims to be eligible, had applied for appointment on compassionate ground on 07.04.2012. However, the District Level Committee (DLC), Jorhat had rejected the application on 09.07.2012. Thereafter in the year 2015, the petitioner had again made a fresh application. Though the DLC had observed that the application was delayed, the matter was nonetheless forwarded to the State Level Committee (SLC). The SLC however vide the impugned decision dated 25.07.2017 had rejected the application of the petitioner on the ground of late submission. It is this action, which is the subject matter of challenge in this writ petition.
3. I have heard Shri A. Ganguly, learned counsel for the petiti
Compassionate appointments are exceptions to normal recruitment rules, not vested rights, and must satisfy immediate needs without prolonged delays affecting eligibility.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions meant for immediate relief and not vested rights; delays undermine their purpose.
Compassionate appointments are an exception for immediate support to bereaved families, not a vested right, and must be considered without undue delay to fulfill their intended purpose.
Compassionate appointment is meant for immediate relief to bereaved families and cannot be claimed after significant delays, as established by the Supreme Court.
Compassionate appointments are intended for immediate relief and should not be claimed after significant delays, as urgency diminishes over time.
Compassionate appointments are not a vested right and must be granted promptly; delays undermine their purpose.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays diminish the urgency of such claims.
Compassionate appointments are exceptions to normal recruitment procedures and must be made promptly to address immediate financial crises; delays undermine this objective.
Compassionate appointments are not vested rights and must be considered promptly to address immediate financial crises; significant delays undermine this purpose.
Compassionate appointment claims must be pursued without undue delay, as significant lags undermine the objective of immediate relief for bereaved families.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.