Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI, ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
D and G Construction – Appellant
Versus
qers – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction invoked for illegal tender allotment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. whether the tender process adhered to the memorandum guidelines. (Para 3) |
| 3. bidders' evaluations and re-evaluations. (Para 4 , 5 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. details regarding the bids and process prior to acceptance of recommendations. (Para 6 , 28 , 30) |
| 5. petitioner's arguments on strict adherence to guidelines. (Para 10 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. judicial interpretation regarding the binding nature of procedural guidelines. (Para 14 , 15 , 29) |
| 7. determination of the absence of legal basis for actions. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 8. role of the sub-committee in the tender decision-making process. (Para 35) |
| 9. court's judgment invalidates previous tender decisions. (Para 36 , 38) |
| 10. final ruling regarding the quashing of the letter of intent. (Para 37) |
| 11. order for prompt allotment of work as per law. (Para 39 , 40) |
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI, J.
1. The extraordinary jurisdiction conferred to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is sought to be invoked by means of this petition, whereby, a challenge has been made to the decision to allot a particular work to the Respondent No. 9 in a tender process. The petitioner has al
The court emphasized adherence to procedural guidelines in tender processes, ruling that decisions must comply with established legal standards to prevent arbitrariness.
The court upheld that the re-evaluation of abnormally low bids by a constituted Sub-committee was proper, ensuring adherence to fair evaluation standards in public procurement processes.
public authorities must be left with the same liberty as they have in framing the policies - Contracts are legally binding commitments and they commit the authority which may be held to be a State wi....
Judicial review of tender rejection mandates clarity and consistency in administrative decisions, with intervention permitted only in cases of gross arbitrariness.
Judicial review in contractual matters is limited to evaluating decision-making processes and does not extend to substituting the authority's decisions unless clear evidence of arbitrariness or mala ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for judicial restraint in interfering with administrative actions, particularly in tender or contract matters, and the limited scope of ju....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
