IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
MARLI VANKUNG, S.K.MEDHI
State of Assam – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Rajowar S/o Late Babu Rajowar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MARLI VANKUNG, J.
1. Heard Mr. K.N. Choudhury, learned Senior counsel appearing as Amicus Curiae, Ms. S. Jahan learned Addl. PP and Mr. M.K. Das for the informant. Also heard Shri S Borthakur, learned counsel for the convict. This is a reference made for the confirmation on the order to suffer death sentence by the Sessions Judge, Jorhat, Assam dated 12.10.2020 in Session Case No. 157(J-T)/19 (GR Case No. 3191/90) on the conviction of Sh. Sanjoy Rajowar under sections 302 IPC and 302/149/342/353/148/149 IPC r/w Section 4 of the AMSP and MSI Act, 2011.
2. The prosecution story in brief is that on 31.08.2019 at 10:10 PM, one Sh. Manoj Gogoi, Senior Manager of Teok Tea Estate, Jorhat, Assam lodged a First Information Report before the Officer-in-charge, Teok Police Station, Jorhat to the effect that on 31.08.2019 the Doctor of the hospital/dispensary of the Teok Tea Estate was killed by a mob. As per the FIR lodged by Sh. Manoj Gogoi, Senior Manager of Teok Tea Estate at around 2:35 PM, one Samra Majhi (30) S/o Late Jagan Majhi of Major Line of Teok Tea Estate slipped in the bathroom and received head injury. At around 3:15 PM, he was brought to Teok Tea Estate Hospital by
Bachan Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Machhi Singh Vs. State of Punjab
State of Haryana Vs. Ram Singh
Chhannu Lal Verma Vs. State of Chattisgarh
State of Uttarakhand Vs. Kuldeep
Bachan Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Macchi Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab
Ramnaresh & Ors. Vs State of Chhattishgarh
Purushottam Dasarath Borate Vs State of Maharashtra
Dhananjoy Chaterjee Vs State of West Bengal
Mukesh Vs State (NCT) of Delhi
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.