Back
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT,(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
N.UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Pratul Kr Das, S/o- Late Amulya Kr. Das – Appellant
Versus
State Of Assam, Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary To The Government Of Assam, Labour And Employment Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual basis of the petitioners' claims (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding inclusion in senior instructor cadre (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis and agreement with prior decision (Para 6 , 11) |
| 4. interpretation of rules regarding instructor roles (Para 10) |
| 5. final orders for promotion consideration (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
1. Heard Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. S.P. Das, learned standing counsel, Employment and Craftsmen Training appearing for the respondents.
2. The petitioners in the present proceeding have prayed for a direction upon the respondent authorities for promoting them from the cadre of Senior Instructor to the cadre of Supervisor by reckoning that the post of Instructor (Social Studies) and Instructor (English language) as held by them to be included within the cadre of “Senior Instructor” as finding mention in Rule 3(c)(iv) of the Assam Craftsman Training Service Rules , 1993 (in short “the Rules of 1993).
3. The petitioner Nos. 1, 2 & 3 were appointed as Instructor (Social Studies) in the various Industrial Training Institutes (ITI) of the State on 24-10-1997, 27-12-1993 and 07-03-
Court affirmed that Instructors (Social Studies and English) are included in the cadre of Senior Instructor per prior ruling, warranting eligibility for promotion to Supervisor.
The court established that the right to promotion is determined by the rules in force at the time of consideration, and the Service Rules of 2020 do not permit promotion from Grade-IV to Junior Assis....
Since statutory rules regulating Government service were only adopted on basis of a resolution by Board of Kerala Water Authority, said rules do not retain statutory flavour in their application to s....
Statutory recruitment rules under Article 309 of the Constitution prevail over executive instructions, allowing states to set qualifications independently.
Point of Law : Service Rules, 2005 would indicate that the post of Principal, Basic Training Centre is not even a post under the said Rules. Therefore, an incumbent holding the post of Principal cann....
AMENDMENT TO RULE 14(V) OF THE RAJASTHAN DISTRICT COURTS MINISTERIAL ESTABLISHMENT RULES, 1986, DOES NOT EXCLUDE STENOGRAPHER GRADE-I AND PERSONAL ASSISTANT CUM EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT FROM THE ZONE OF C....
Promotions must respect principles of natural justice, including the right to a hearing for affected parties before decisions are made.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the qualifications possessed at the time of appointment determine the nature of the appointment, and benefits cannot be claimed based on parit....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the prohibition for retrospective promotion under the Karnataka State Civil Services Act and Rules, and the significance of seniority in determinin....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
