Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH
KARDAK ETE
Mark M Humtsoe – Appellant
Versus
State Of Nagaland Represented By The Commissioner And Secretary, Dept. Of Health And Family Welfare – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claim based on land ownership (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. discrimination in land ownership policy and appointments (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. validity of the purported agreement and state policy (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. enforceability of landowner agreements under government policy (Para 28 , 29) |
| 5. court's dismissal of petitioner's claims (Para 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT :
KARDAK ETE, J.
Heard Ms. R. Wunchibeni Tsanglao, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Mozhui, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 4 & 6; Mr. M. Longkumer, learned Government Advocate for the respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 5 and Mr. N. M. Konyak, learned counsel for the respondent No. 7.
2. By filing this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the Notification dated 05.03.2018 issued by the Chief Secretary, Government of Nagaland, particularly Clause 3(a) thereof, whereby it is provided that in cases prior to 26.07.2005 and subsequent to the setting up of Administrative and Block Headquarters on freely donated land, where a specific written agreement exists providing for employment to the landowner, the claim of such landowner for employment shall be settled in terms of t
The court confirmed that agreements lacking mutual consent do not establish enforceable rights, and policies favoring landowners who donated land are not discriminatory against those who sold their l....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an agreement for appointment on landownership basis must comply with government policies on land acquisition and appointment to Grade-IV posts....
The court affirmed that government employment based on landownership is not guaranteed perpetually and must adhere to existing policies on vacancies.
The appointment of a public post must adhere to Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, ensuring equal opportunity through proper advertisement.
A petitioner must come to court with clean hands and disclose all material facts; failure to do so can result in dismissal of the claim.
Appointment based on landownership was limited to the first landowner, confirming no perpetual employment rights for descendants under constitutional provisions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
