A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
Tomy J. Cherkkott, S/o. Joseph – Appellant
Versus
M. M. Abdul Sathar, S/o. Abdulla – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shoba Annamma Eapen, J.
The common question involved in all these Original Petitions (Rent Control) is whether the Rent Control Court exercising jurisdiction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') has jurisdiction to amend the pleadings in the Rent Control Petition on the application of the petitioners/landlords.
2. With regard to the said question, we may refer to essential facts. We will refer to the parties according to their status in the Rent Control Petition.
3. The petitioners are the owners of the building wherein the petition scheduled shop rooms are situated. The Rent Control Petitions are filed seeking eviction of the respondents under Sections 11(4)(i) and 11(8) of the Act. The petitioners are the landlords and the respondents are the tenants.
4. The original petitions are filed against the orders dated 28.1.2022 in I.A.Nos.108/2020 in R.C.P.No.37/2018, 112/2020 in RCP No.41/2018, 109/2020 in R.C.P.No.40/2018, 113/2020 in R.C.P.No.42/2018, 111/2020 in RCP No.35/2018, 110/2020 in RCP No.44/2018, 105/2020 in RCP No.31/2018, 106/2020 in RCP No.34/2018, 115/2020 in RCP No.43/2018, 114/2020 in RCP No.38/2018
Abdul Kareem v. Muhammed Shafi
Lalitha R. Prabhu v. Krishna alias Lakshmi Bai
M. Abdul Kareem v. P. Muhammed Shafi
Kooleri Padinjare Veettil Narayanan v. Nalupurappattil Tahira
Krishna Iyer T.V. v. Abdul Rasheed
Om Prakash Gupta v. Ranbir B. Goyal
Janaki Amma and another v. Bhaskaran Nambiar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.