IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SATHISH NINAN, J.
USHA V. PARAMESWARAN – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 20658 of 2021
Decided On : 17-03-2023
Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies Act, 2010 - Section 45A, 26, 22 - University Teachers - Posts of Assistant Professors - Petitioners are aspirants to posts of Assistant Professors in second respondent University. In this writ petition, they challenge constitutional validity of Section 45A of Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies Act, 2010 in so far as it relates to prescription of qualification for teaching posts, and also notification issued by University for filling up of teaching posts with such Prescription - KUFOS Act, 2010 was amended by Act 18 of 2021 incorporating Section 45A.
Findings of the Court:
Section 45A of the KUFOS Act requires the degree to be approved by the ICAR. Ext.P7 public notice does not mention that the Council does not approve any degree granted by Universities. It only says that it does not give “recognition” and “affiliation” to any University or any course offered by the University, and also that it does not give “approval or permission to University to offer programmes in agricultural science.” This is further evident from Ext.R5(a) and (b) communications issued by the ICAR. Therein, it is said that the Council has approved UG degrees in agriculture and allied subjects as professional degree courses.
Result: Writ Petition is dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
SATHISH NINAN, J.
1. The petitioners are aspirants to the posts of Assistant Professors in the second respondent University. In this writ petition, they challenge the constitutional validity of Section 45A of the Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies Act, 2010 (hereinafter, referred to as the KUFOS Act) in so far as it relates to the prescription of qualification for teaching posts, and also the notification issued by the University for filling up of teaching posts with such prescription.
2. I have heard Sri. P. Ravindran, the learned Senior Counsel on behalf of the petitioners, the learned Government Pleader for respondents 1, 2 and 3, Sri. T.C. Krishna, the learned counsel for the 4th respondent, Sri. James Abraham (Vilayakattu), the learned C.R. counsel for additional respondents 5 to 15, Sri. Isaac Kuruvilla Illikal, the learned counsel for additional respondent No. 16 and Sri. Jaju Babu, the learned Senior Counsel for the University.
3. KUFOS Act, 2010 was amended by Act 18 of 2021 incorporating Section 45A. The writ petition was filed prior to the passing of the Act and when the amendment ordinance was promulgated.
4. Pending the writ petition, the Act came into force, and consequential amendments were made in the writ petition.
5. Section 45A of the KUFOS Act reads thus:
(1) Each Faculty shall have teachers in the categories of Professor, Associate Professor and Assistant Professor distinctly:
Provided that a teacher from one faculty may be allowed to teach in another faculty as required.
(2) Of the teaching posts of the Faculty of Fisheries transferred from the University of Agriculture, the departments except Fisheries Engineering, Management and Fisheries Hydrography shall be retained in the faculty of Fisheries of this University.
(3) The appointment, powers and duties of the teaching posts shall be as prescribed by the statutes. But the teachers in the Fisheries Faculty shall have degree in Fisheries Science approved by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, postgraduate degree in the Fisheries subject concerned and other qualifications as mandated by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research:
Provided that the degree in Fisheries Science is not mandatory for those who are continuing, as on the date of commencement of the Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies (Amendment) Act, 2021, in the teaching post in the Faculty of Fisheries in the University.
(4) Teacher shall be responsible to the Head of the Department for the activities of the teaching, research and extension programs entrusted to him.”
Sub-Section (3) thereof contains the prescription of qualification, which is under challenge in this writ petition. As per sub-section (3), the teachers in the fisheries faculty shall have degree in Fisheries Science approved by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Postgraduate degree in the Fisheries subject concerned and other qualifications as mandated by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research. Challenge against the said prescription of qualification is on two grounds:
(i) The qualification prescribed is repugnant to the qualification prescribed under the University Grants Commission (for short UGC) regulations.
(ii) The qualification prescribed is irrational and unreasonable.”
6. Ext.P1 is the “UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2018.” That the second respondent University is bound by Ext.P1 UGC Regulations, is not in dispute.
7. Regulation 4.1 - I (A)(i) of Ext.P1 prescribes the qualification for Assistant Professor. The said regulation reads thus:
Sri. P. Ravindra
Dr. K.K. Vijayan vs. Chancellor, KUFOS
Dr. Preeti Srivastava and Others v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
E.P. Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Gambhirdhan K. Gadhvi vs. State of Gujarat and Others
Justice K.S. Puttuswamy (Retd.) vs. Union of India
Kalyani Mathivanan vs. K.V. Jeyaraj
Section 45A of KUFOS Act requires the degree to be approved by ICAR.
State legislation can prescribe higher qualifications for educational positions without violating UGC regulations, as such requirements do not constitute repugnancy but enhance academic standards.
The prerogative of the employer to prescribe qualifications for a post and the limited scope for judicial interference in such matters.
The court emphasized the relevance and equivalence of the qualification possessed by the petitioners, as opined by the University of Jammu and University of Kashmir, and highlighted the importance of....
Promotions in government service must adhere to specified educational qualifications, notably the 10+2+3 pattern, to be valid; prior promotions awarded despite this requirement were upheld on grounds....
a candidate for recruitment to any post must possess the requisite qualification statutorily prescribed and the Court exercising the power of judicial review cannot expand upon the ambit of prescribe....
The UGC Regulations of 2018 must be adhered to by the State Government in recruitment processes, as they provide broader eligibility criteria than previous regulations.
Point of law: A criterion which has the effect of denying a candidate his right to be considered for the post on the principle that he is having higher qualification than prescribed cannot be rationa....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.