SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 670

ALEXANDER THOMAS, C. JAYACHANDRAN, SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
Mattanur Co-Operative Rural Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Co-Operative Arbitration Court – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SRI. GEORGE POONTHOTTAM AND ADVS.M/S. NISHA GEORGE & A.L.NAVANEETH KRISHNAN
For the Respondent: SRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SABEENA P.ISMAIL SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY AND SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER [Co-operation] SRI. P.P.THAJUDEEN FOR SRI. P.N.MOHANAN

Judgement Key Points
  • The case involves multiple writ appeals referred to a Full Bench for reconsideration of the authority to issue memos of charges under Rule 198 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules in disciplinary proceedings against employees of co-operative societies. [judgement_subject] (!) (!) [1][2][3]

  • The Full Bench was constituted following a Division Bench order dated 12.4.2023 doubting the correctness of an earlier view that Rule 198(2B) does not empower the disciplinary sub-committee to frame memos of charges, holding such power exclusively with the appointing authority (managing committee). (!) (!) [1]

  • Facts in W.A. No. 934/2022: Co-operative Arbitration Court set aside disciplinary action relying on prior ruling, holding disciplinary sub-committee lacked authority to issue memo of charges; writ petition dismissed, leading to appeal. (!)

  • Rule 198 governs disciplinary actions; pre-2010 amendment allowed managing committee to both initiate and finalize actions, challenged for negating appeal rights under Rule 198(4). (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)

  • Post-2010 amendment inserted sub-rules (2A) and (2B): Committee must constitute disciplinary sub-committee (not including President) to inquire into charges, either itself or via external agency. (!) (!) (!)

  • Table under Rule 198(3) designates authorities for penalties: For higher-rank employees (Secretary/Manager and above), President/Chairman for minor penalties (a)-(c), sub-committee/executive committee for major penalties (d)-(h); for other employees, Secretary/Manager for minor, President for major. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)

  • Appellate authorities under Rule 198(4): Executive Committee/Board for higher-rank employees' minor penalties, President/Board for others. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)

  • Managing committee (appointing authority under Rule 182(2)) cannot impose penalties as it is appellate authority under Rule 198(4), to preserve appeal rights; penalties by designated authorities in Rule 198(3). (!) (!) [59][60][61][62][63]

  • "Charges" broader than "memo of charges/charge sheet": "Charges" means allegations of acts/omissions; "memo of charges" is formal document specifying allegations for defense. (!)

  • No explicit provision in Rule 198 mandates appointing authority alone to issue memos of charges; silence allows other competent authorities, including superiors or controlling authorities. (!) [84]

  • Disciplinary sub-committee (under Rule 198(2A)/(2B)) same as sub-committee in Rule 198(3); empowered to inquire into charges and, as penalty authority for certain cases, to frame/issue memos of charges as first step in inquiry process. (!) (!) (!) [62


ORDER :

Alexander Thomas, J.

The afore captioned cases have been placed before this Full Bench on the basis of the order dated 12.4.2023 rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in those cases, whereby it has been held that the view taken by an earlier Division Bench in Kodanchery Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Joshy Varghese [2020(4) KLT 129 (DB) = 2020 KHC 5394 = 2020 (3) KLJ 474], requires serious re-consideration and hence these cases have been referred to the Full Bench for an authoritative determination of the issues mentioned in the said reference order, in exercise of the powers under Sec. 7 of the KERALA HIGH COURT ACT . In Kodanchery's case supra [2020(4) KLT 129 (DB)], rendered on 13.1.2020, the Division Bench has considered the provisions contained in Rule 198 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies (KCS) Rules, framed under the Kerala Co-operative Societies (KCS) Act, in the matter of disciplinary action affecting the employees of co-operative societies, more particularly sub rules (2A) and (2B) of Rule 198 and it has been held therein, more particularly in para N

                          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                          1
                          2
                          3
                          4
                          5
                          6
                          7
                          8
                          9
                          10
                          11
                          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                          supreme today icon
                          logo-black

                          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                          Please visit our Training & Support
                          Center or Contact Us for assistance

                          qr

                          Scan Me!

                          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                          whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                          whatsapp-icon Back to top