K. BABU
Sama Rubbers – Appellant
Versus
South Indian Bank Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K. BABU, J.
1. The prayers in this Original Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India are as follows:
(a) Setting aside Exhibit P4 order in I.A. No. No. 2750 of 2023 in S.A. No. 448 of 2023 of Debt Recovery Tribunal-2, Ernakulam.
(b) Directing the Debt Recovery Tribunal-2, Ernakulam to consider all questions such as prima facie case, irreparable injury and balance of convenience etc. of the parties and pass fresh order in I.A. No. No. 2750 of 2023 in S.A. No. 448 of 2023 of Debt Recovery Tribunal-2, Ernakulam.
(c) Any other relief that the honourable court may deem appropriate to meet the ends of justice.”
Facts:
2. Petitioner No. 1 is a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act. Petitioner No. 2 is the Managing Partner of the firm. Petitioner No. 3 is one of the partners. Petitioner No. 4 is a guarantor of the loan availed by petitioner No. 1 from respondent No. 1, the bank (secured creditor).
2.1. On 15.12.2017, petitioner No. 2 had availed a credit facility from the bank to the tune of Rs. 10 Crores in
Celina Coelho Pereira vs. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar
Canara Bank vs. Stephen John and Others
Estralla Rubber vs. Dass Estate (P) Ltd. (2001) 8 SCC 97
Garment Craft vs. Prakash Chand Goel
L&T Housing Finance Ltd. vs. M/s. Trishul Developers and Another
Muhammed Ashraf vs. Union of India
Raveendran Pilla P. and Others vs. State of Kerala and Others
Umesh Kumar vs. State of A.P. (2013) 10 SCC 591
Varghese A.P. vs. Chief Manager (Authorized Officer) Vijaya Bank and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.