M. A. ABDUL HAKHIM
Narayan Achary Krishnan Kutty, S/O. Narayan Achary – Appellant
Versus
Janardhanan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This Regular Second Appeal is filed by defendants 1, 3 & 4 in a suit for partition.
2. The respondents 1 to 7 are the plaintiffs in the suit. During the pendency of this Regular Second Appeal, the 3rd respondent/3rd plaintiff died, and his legal representatives are impleaded as respondent Nos.8 to 10 as per order dated 19.12.2022 in I.A.No.3/2019.
3. The parties are referred according to their status before the Trial Court.
4. The plaintiffs filed the suit for partition of plaint A & B schedule properties belonged to Pappu Achari Narayanan Achari in equal shares of 1/9 each among the plaintiffs (7Nos) and the defendants 1 & 2, who are the children of Narayanan Achari who died on 16.11.1998 claiming that the plaint schedule properties belonged to Narayanan Achari as per Ext.A1 Deed; and that wife of Narayanan Achari predeceased Narayanan Achari.
5. According to the plaintiffs, both plaint A & B schedule properties are lying as a single compact plot; that Narayanan Achari and the first plaintiff constructed a house in the plaint schedule properties utilizing their funds; the plaint A schedule property has an extent of 4 cents with a building therein. Plaint B schedule proper
Banerjee and Others v. Subodh Kumar Banerjee and Others (AIR 1964 SC 529
DhaniRam (died) through Lrs and Others V.Shiv Singh AIR 2023 SC 4787
K. Laxmanan v. Thekkayil Padmini and others (2009) 1 SCC 354
Kavita KanwarV.Pamela Mehta and others AIR 2020 SC 2614
Puspavati and Others v. Chandraja Kadamba and Others (AIR 1972 SC 2492)).
Raj Kumari and others v. Surinder Pal Sharma (2021) 14 SCC 500
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.