SOPHY THOMAS
SOMAN S/O GOPALAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SOPHY THOMAS, J.
1. This appeal is filed by the sureties of the accused in S.C. No. 122 of 2003 on the file of Additional Sessions Judge Fast Track Court-II, Alappuzha, challenging Annexure-A order dated 12.01.2005 by which they were ordered to pay penalty of Rs.20,000/- each.
2. The accused in S.C. No. 122 of 2003 absconded, and notice was ordered to the appellants who were his sureties. In spite of service of notice, they neither appeared nor showed any reason for not forfeiting the bond amount. Finding that the appellants violated the conditions in the bail bond, the trial court ordered them to pay penalty of Rs.20,000/- each, against which they have preferred this appeal.
3. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondent-State.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants would submit that, the accused for whom they stood as sureties was subsequently arrested, and produced before court, and after trial, he was acquitted also. When the accused was arrested, and produced before the trial court, his case number was changed and so the appellants could not follow up the proceedings so as to make their appearance before court. But, they are not disputi
The court established that due process requires notice to be given to sureties before imposing penalties for bond forfeiture, ensuring adherence to natural justice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to adhere to the prescribed procedure under Section 446 CrPC for the forfeiture of surety bonds, including issuing show cause notic....
A surety must be afforded an opportunity to contest the imposition of a penalty for non-production of an accused, adhering to principles of natural justice.
Procedure when bond has been forfeited - Without discussing application of sub-section(3) of Section 446 Cr.P.C. and benefit conferred for remission of portion of penalty, cannot be said to have forc....
A surety bond is unenforceable without a corresponding personal bond from the accused, as per S. 499 CrPC.
Sureties are bound to pay penalty upon bail bond forfeiture; subsequent production of the accused does not negate this obligation.
Court holds that the penalty for surety bond forfeiture must consider the surety's efforts and circumstances; excessive penalties can be modified at judicial discretion.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.