IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G.ARUN, J.
Sreelekha Abhilash, W/O Abhilash P S – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) No. 15488 of 2024
Decided on : 21-11-2024
(A) Kerala Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2021 - Paragraph 37(1) - Nomination of legal heir for Fair Price Shop licence - The term 'legal heir' is not defined in the KTPDS Order; however, it must be interpreted in accordance with personal law. The court held that a daughter-in-law does not qualify as a legal heir for nomination purposes. (Paras 3, 6, 8)
(B) Legal Interpretation - The distinction between 'heir' and 'legal heir' is crucial; while 'heir' may refer to anyone entitled to inherit, 'legal heir' is specifically recognized by law. (Paras 6, 7)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to be appointed as the licencee of a Fair Price Shop after her father-in-law's nomination was rejected on the grounds of not being a legal heir. The authorities dismissed her appeal based on personal law definitions.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the nomination of a daughter-in-law does not meet the legal requirements set forth in the KTPDS Order, as she is not recognized as a legal heir under personal law.
Issues: The main issue was whether a daughter-in-law can be considered a legal heir for the purpose of nomination under the KTPDS Order.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the term 'legal heir' must be interpreted strictly in accordance with personal law, and thus, the petitioner does not qualify.
Result: The writ petition is dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
The petitioner is the daughter-in-law of late K.R.Sivarajan, who was the Authorised Retail Distributor of Fair Price Shop No.23 in Mezhuvelli, Pathanamthitta District. While the petitioner was working as saleswoman in the shop, her father-in-law, who had become aged and sickly, nominated her for appointment as licencee of the Fair Price Shop. The requisite application, was also submitted, in terms of Paragraph 37(1) of the Kerala Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2021 ('the KTPDS Order' for short). However, the 3rd respondent rejected the nomination on the ground that the petitioner is not the legal heir of the licencee. The appeal filed against that order was dismissed by the District Collector and a revision filed before the Government met with the same fate. Hence, this writ petition.
2. Heard, Adv.Jacob P Alex and Senior Government Pleader Adv.Sunil Kuriakose.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the authorities grossly erred in giving a restricted meaning to the term 'legal heir'. It is contended that the term 'legal heir' is not defined in the KTPDS Order and nomination for transfer of licence is not similar to the succession of property under personal laws. Being so, the expression 'legal heir', used in Paragraph 37(1) of the KTPDS Order should be understood in the ordinary parlance. Relying on the decisions in Gulzara Singh Nanta Singh v. Smt.Tej Kaur [AIR 1961 P&H 288], Mercy v. Aisha Ummal [1987 2 KLT 166] and Bay Berry Apartments (P) Ltd and another v. Shobha and others [(2006) 13 SCC 737], it is argued that, in ordinary parlance, the expression 'heir' takes in all persons entitled to property held and possessed by or under the law of inheritance. Referring to Exts.P6(a) and P9 judgments, it is submitted that, under similar circumstances, this Court had directed the authorities to consider the nomination of a daughter-in-law as the licencee. Alternatively it is contended that, having worked as salesperson of the ARD for more than ten years, the petitioner is even otherwise entitled to be appointed as licencee as provided in Paragraph 37(5) of the KTPDS Order.
4. In reply, learned Government Pleader submitted that daughter-in-law cannot claim the status of a 'legal heir', since legal heirship is decided in accordance with the personal law of the deceased. It is pointed out that the application submitted by the licencee did not also contain the nomination in Form 'J' Annexure X, which is mandatory. The petitioner's claim under Paragraph 37(5) of the KTPDS Order is also not maintainable, since she does not have the requisite 10 years experience as a salesperson.
5. As the petitioner's claim for allotment of licence is based on Paragraph 37(1) of the KTPDS Order, the said provision is extracted hereunder for easy reference;
6. A reading of the provision reveals that, Paragraph 37(1) provides an option for the existing ARDs, under the Kerala Rationing Order to nominate his/her legal heir as the next licencee. The short question is whether a daughter-in-law can be treated as legal heir for the purpose of such nomination. While learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the expression 'legal heir' cannot be construed in its strict sense considering the purpose of Paragraph 37(1), the counter argument of the learned Government Pleader is that daughter-in-law can be a heir, but not a legal heir and her no
A daughter-in-law is not considered a legal heir for the purpose of nomination under the Kerala Targeted Public Distribution System Order, as defined by personal law.
Court dismisses Writ Appeal, affirming the necessity of legal heirship certificates in ration depot license applications.
Point of law : The definition of 'family' includes wife or husband; sons; unmarried and widowed daughters; and if the deceased was an unmarried government servant, the brother, unmarried sister and w....
The court affirmed that employees with long tenure in a shop have preferential rights to appointment as licensees under applicable welfare legislation, despite changes in licensing status.
Point of law : The purpose for excluding the married daughter from the canopy of family under the Control Order of 2016 is that a fair price shop runs upon a license granted by the State agencies in ....
Categorical admission made in the pleadings cannot be permitted to be withdrawn by way of an amendment.
The court emphasized the importance of fulfilling the essential conditions for appointment as per the relevant government orders and upheld the non-discriminatory nature of the definition of 'family'....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the definition of 'family members' in the Control Order, 2013 should be inclusive of the dependents of bachelors/spinsters, especially sibling....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.