Back
NITIN JAMDAR, S. MANU
Sruthi Sasidharan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala Department Of Electronics & Information Technology – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Nitin Jamdar, C.J.
By this appeal filed under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, the Appellants/Petitioners have challenged the interim order dated 23 January 2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. (C)No.2679 of 2025 whereby the writ petition was admitted however, stay to the selection process for allotment of Akshaya Centre had not been granted by holding that the selection would be subject to the outcome of the writ petition.
2. The Petitioners, who were among the candidates participating in the selection process for the post of 'Akshaya Centre Entrepreneurs,' by W.P.(C)No.2679 of 2025 challenged the policy adopted by the District Authority of the Akshaya Project in Kannur, which grants 2.4 marks as 'form marks' at the time of application and an additional 10% of the total marks—comprising 'form marks,' examination marks, and interview marks—at the time of publication of the rank lists for allocating reservation benefits to SC/ST candidates. The learned Single Judge, by the interim order dated 23 January 2025, admitted the writ petition and refused to stay the selection process for allotment of Akshaya Centre but observed that the selection would be su
The prosecution must explain the non-recovery of the weapon when relying solely on victim testimony for conviction under IPC, impacting the charge levelled.
Interlocutory modification of interim stay permitting top-ranked appointments subject to writ outcome upheld; no illegality found.
An ‘order’ obviously cannot include mere procedural orders of adjournment, admission of writ, summoning of documents or witnesses, or directing local inspection etc. which orders do not seriously aff....
The Letters Patent allows appeals only against judgments that conclusively affect rights; interim orders lacking such determinations are not appealable.
Point of law: Interim order of Single – Appeal not maintainable - Character of the ad interim order would continue to be the same until an adjudication is made by the irrespective of the fact as to w....
An appeal against an interim order is permissible if it substantially affects the rights or liabilities of the parties, as per Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act.
The High Court should not entertain writ petitions under Article 226 when effective alternative remedies under the SARFAESI Act are available; exceptions apply in cases of jurisdictional errors, frau....
(1) Letters Patent Appeal – Word ‘judgment’ has a concept of finality in a broader and not in a narrower sense--Where an order vitally affects a valuable right of defendants, it will be treated as a ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
