IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ.
Viswanathan - Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala - Respondents
WP(C) NO. 30888 OF 2013
Decided on : 12-03-2025
(A) Kerala Land Conservancy Act, 1957 - Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution - Petitioners sought to quash the District Collector's order declining to evict encroachers from temple property - Court found that the Collector's order did not adequately address the validity of purchase certificates obtained by encroachers - The court emphasized the need for proper inquiry and adherence to statutory provisions regarding temple properties. (Paras 1 , 2 , 33 )
(B) Jurisdiction of Land Tribunal - The court reiterated that the Land Tribunal must verify the existence of valid tenancy before proceeding with eviction or issuing purchase certificates, as per the provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act. (Paras 26 , 34 )
Facts of the case:
The petitioners, representing a temple committee, challenged the District Collector's order which failed to evict illegal occupants from temple property, citing invalid purchase certificates issued by the Land Tribunal. (Paras 1 , 2 )
Findings of Court:
The court set aside the Collector's order and directed a reconsideration of the matter, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions and proper inquiry into the validity of purchase certificates. (Paras 33 )
Issues: The main issues included the validity of purchase certificates issued to encroachers and the proper procedure for eviction under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act. (Paras 10 , 33 )
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Collector's order lacked sufficient inquiry into the legality of encroachments and emphasized the need for adherence to statutory provisions regarding temple properties. (Paras 33 )
Result: Writ petition allowed; the Collector's order set aside and matter remanded for reconsideration.
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioners are the President and Secretary of Thanalur Sree Narasimhamoorthi Temple Committee. Thanalur Sree Narasimhamoorthi Temple is a controlled institution under the additional 24th respondent Malabar Devaswom Board. The petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P5 order dated 29.10.2013 of the 2nd respondent District Collector, Malappuram, to the extent the said respondent declines to invoke the provision under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act , 1957, to evict respondents 8 to 19 and others from the property of Thanalur Sree Narasimhamoorthi Temple. The petitioners have also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 6 to evict respondents 8 to 19 from the temple property mentioned in Ext.P4 judgment of this Court dated 28.05.2012 in W.P.(C)No.8917 of 2012, within a time limit to be fixed by this Court; a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 6 to see that all the encroachers in the property of said temple are evicted and the properties are restored to the Devaswom, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court; and a declaration that the purchase certificate issued by the Land Tribunal in favour of respondents 8 to 19 and others, in respect of the property of Thanalur Sree Narasimhamoorthi Temple are not in conformity with the provisions under the Kerala Land Reforms Act , 1963 and the Rules made thereunder, and are illegal and not binding on the temple and its properties.
2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, there is a large extent of property that belongs to the temple in question and the same was encroached upon and unauthorisedly occupied by respondents 8 to 19 and others. In a report submitted by a team constituted by the erstwhile Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, the encroachment and unauthorised occupation of the property belonging to the temple were reported. The Executive Officer of the temple and also the petitioners have approached the 2nd respondent District Collector to get evicted respondents 8 to 19 and others. This Court, by Ext.P4 judgment dated 28.05.2012 in W.P.(C)No.8917 of 2012, directed the 2nd respondent District Collector to conduct enquiry and take appropriate action under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act , within a time frame. In Ext.P5 order dated 29.10.2013 passed by the 2nd respondent District Collector it was found that there are illegal occupants in the temple property. However, it was noticed that some of them obtained purchase certificates from the Land Tribunal. The District Collector directed the petitioners to approach the Appellate Authority under the Land Reforms Act for cancellation of the purchase certificates and directed the revenue authorities to initiate proceedings under the Kerala Land Conservancy Act against others. According to the petitioners, in view of the decision of this Court in Travancore Devaswom Board v. Mohanan Nair [2013 (3) KLT 132] , the purchase certificates obtained by the party respondents are invalid. Challenging Ext.P5 order of the 2nd respondent District Collector and seeking eviction of respondents 8 to 19, the petitioners are before this Court in this writ petition.
3. On 16.12.2013, when this writ petition came up for admission, it was admitted on file. The learned Standing Counsel for Malabar Devaswom Board took notice for respondents 6 and 7. Urgent notice was ordered to others.
4. Respondents 14 and 19 have filed a counter affidavit dated 06.09.2014, opposing the reliefs sought for in this writ petition, which was followed by the counter affidavit dated 27.07.2015 filed by the 2nd respondent District Collector. Respondents 11, 16 and 18 have filed a counter affidavit dated 21.09.2022, producing therewith Exts.R11(a) to R11(d) purchase certificates issued by the Land Tribunal, Malappruam on 20.05.1977, 21.05.1997 and 27.05.1985 respectively in S.M.Proceedings Nos.6078/1977, 607
The court emphasized the necessity for proper inquiry into the validity of encroachments and adherence to statutory provisions regarding temple properties, particularly concerning purchase certificat....
Land Tribunals must adhere rigorously to statutory requirements when processing assignments of rights related to religious endowments, ensuring the protection of such properties from wrongful claims.
Parties must include all necessary stakeholders, such as landowners, in proceedings regarding temple land to ensure legal validity and adherence to statutory mandates.
The Kerala Land Conservancy Act enables summary eviction from Government land; however, established occupancy and title disputes require civil court adjudication.
Collateral materials will also have to be looked into to ascertain the genesis of the property.
Transactions regarding religious endowments must demonstrate absolute legal necessity and obtain prior authorization, or they will be deemed void such that any resulting deeds or certificates lack le....
The court ruled that the lease of temple property was unjustifiable due to non-compliance with statutory requirements and lack of necessity, emphasizing the prioritization of temple interests over pu....
A lease for temple property must demonstrate necessity and benefit to the deity; merely augmenting income is insufficient and procedural violations render the decision unjustifiable.
Statutory remedies must be pursued before seeking court intervention under Article 226.
Writ petitions seeking eviction from private temple lands under Land Conservancy Act are not maintainable without impleading Ooralans as necessary parties, as Act provisions apply only to Devaswom Bo....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.