Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
Mathew B. Kurian, Partner – Appellant
Versus
National Council For Teacher Education – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, Mathew B. Kurian, an advocate representing M/s. Peter & Karunakar and the son of the late Advocate V.M. Kurian, who passed away on 07.06.2018, seek intervention regarding the respondents' failure to settle pending legal fees. The first respondent, the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE), a statutory body under the 1993 Act, is a ‘State’ under Article 12 of the Constitution and subject to writ jurisdiction. The petitioner states that NCTE appointed Sri V. M. Kurian as Standing Counsel in 2000, who handled over 590 cases for nearly two decades, with bills totalling Rs. 12,11,770/- remaining unpaid despite regular invoicing. After the appointment of a new counsel in April 2018, the petitioner informed NCTE of pending bills and case files, which were delivered to the new counsel in July 2018, who assured payment. Despite repeated requests, bills from 2004 remain unpaid, with no response from NCTE.
2. The petitioner asserts that there is no dispute over the fees owed and that NCTE is capable of clearing dues. In response, the 3rd respondent states that the bills were processed with a request for detailed information, such as case classification, document
An advocate is entitled to payment for services rendered, and disputes over fees do not bar the maintainability of writ petitions against state bodies under Article 226.
Claims for unpaid legal fees by an Advocate must be pursued in civil courts, and attempts to halt legal proceedings over fee disputes violate the ethics and dignity of the profession.
The Court emphasized that public authorities must honor payment obligations to legal representatives, rejecting claims of non-agreement on fees where precedent payments were made, and affirmed the ma....
Every Advocate, who is rendering Legal provisional Services to the State and its instrumentalities in the capacity of Advocate-General, Additional Advocate-General, Law Officer and Standing Counsel, ....
Government bodies are mandated to clear professional fees owed to lawyers in a timely manner, eliminating the need for legal action by counsels to secure payment.
Government pleader entitled to certified legal fees despite administrative delay; mandamus issued for payment.
Timely payment of professional fees to law officers and the need for a centralized system for engagement and payment of law officers' fees.
The court established that compliance with the relevant Rules on advocate fees validated the partnership firm's claim for payment irrespective of the prior litigation's dismissal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
