Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
D. K. SINGH
Sudhin Krishna C.S. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner’s background and request for name change. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. procedural status of the application for name change. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. parties' arguments regarding legal provisions and judgments. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court’s analysis of statutory rules on name and religion changes. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. constitutional protection of freedom of religion. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. judgment following precedent and allowing change of name/religion. (Para 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT :
D.K. SINGH, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
2. The petitioner’s parents belong to different religions. The father of the petitioner is a Muslim and the mother of the petitioner is a Hindu. Though the petitioner was born in Palani, Tamil Nadu, but he was brought up in Kerala at Kodunthirapully in Palakkad District. The petitioner completed his Secondary Education at Grace Higher Secondary School, Kodunthirapully. However, the school is no longer in existence. At the time of admission in the school, the petitioner’s name was ‘Mohammed Riyazudeen C.S.’ and his religion was mentioned as ‘Islam, Mappila’ .
3. According to the petitioner, wh
The court affirmed the right to change one's religion and name in official records under Rule 3(1) of KER 1959, supported by constitutional protections.
Individuals have the constitutional right to change their religion, and official records must be updated to reflect such changes, irrespective of the absence of specific provisions.
The court may exercise extraordinary jurisdiction to amend marriage certificates despite procedural restrictions in specific cases for justice.
The court upheld the authority of birth certificates over subsequent school records for name changes, asserting the necessity for consistency in official identification.
The court holds that failure to challenge relevant government orders impacts the proceedings regarding corrections in school records.
The right to change one's name is a fundamental right, but such changes do not retroactively alter educational records reflecting past identities.
Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees freedom of conscience, including the right to declare non-belief in any religion, but requires quantifiable evidence for public interest claims.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
