Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, SYAM KUMAR V.M., JJ
Kerala State Road Transport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
K.N. Sreenivasan, S/o. Narayanan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court details the appeal's background. (Para 1) |
| 2. appellant's delay and arguments regarding payment. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's intention to proceed despite service issues. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. inordinate delay and lack of justification. (Para 6) |
| 5. legal precedents on delay and laches. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. court decision to not condone delay. (Para 19) |
JUDGMENT :
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
The present intra-court appeal filed under Section 5 of the KERALA HIGH COURT ACT , 1958 arises out of the judgment dated 25.01.2011 passed in W.P.(C) No.2516 of 2011 whereby the learned Single Judge has disposed of the writ petition holding that the respondents are entitled to the arrears of 1997 pay revision effected in the appellant-Corporation from 01.03.1997 till 31.10.1999 or the respective date of their retirement, whichever is earlier.
2. The present appeal has been filed with a delay of 907 days, for condonation of which C.M.Appln.No.1 of 2013 has been filed. The reasons assigned for the delay in filing the appeal is that, immediately after obtaining certified copy of the judgment, earnest efforts were made by the appellant-Corporat
Inordinate delay in filing appeal lacks satisfactory explanation, mandating dismissal under principles of delay and laches, emphasizing that delay defeats equity.
Inordinate delay of 17 years in filing a writ petition can preclude relief under Article 226, emphasizing the principle that delay defeats equity.
Point of Law : Doctrine of delay and laches should not be lightly brushed aside. A writ court is required to weigh the explanation offered and the acceptability of the same. The court should bear in ....
Delay in filing a writ appeal must be sufficiently justified; lack of justification can lead to dismissal of the appeal.
Inordinate delay in filing a writ petition under Article 226 can bar relief, emphasizing that applicants must act within a reasonable timeframe to preserve their rights.
Delay in challenging promotions can bar relief; timely action is crucial in promotion matters.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
