SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ker) 2486

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J.
Chithranjan Thampan S/o Raghava Panicker - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala - Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 24545 of 2025
Decided On : 25-07-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Nidhi Abraham, Shiji P.S., Abraham Varghese E.M.

An applicant must submit a full application for land conversion, as unilateral reduction of land area contradicts statutory procedure and conservation objectives.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 - Section 27A and Rule 12 - The petition sought the classification of unnotified land, contending erroneous classification as paddy land by respondents - However, the application was limited to a part of the land, conflicting with requirements that necessitate submission for the entire property - The court emphasized that the applicant cannot unilaterally reduce land area and must seek approval for the entire extent. (Paras 1-12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought a direction to change the classification of land from paddy to unnotified, with an application pertaining to only a portion of the total land owned, which misaligned with statutory requirements.

Findings of Court:
The R.D.O. possesses the authority to demarcate land for water conservancy and must ensure applications meet procedural criteria as outlined.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the application for changing the nature of land adhered to the procedural requirements, particularly regarding land classification and the necessity to apply for the entire extent.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the applicant must submit a comprehensive application covering the total land extent, as allowing selective application undermines the procedural integrity of the rules and the conservation objectives.

Result: The petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh application in adherence to the established rules.

ORDER :

1. The writ petition is filed for a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P3 application in Form 7 under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the KERALA CONSERVATION OF PADDY LAND AND WET LAND ACT and Rules, 2008 (‘Act and Rules' for short), to change the nature of the petitioner’s property in the revenue records.

2. The petitioner’s case is that his property is unnotified land. However, the respondents have erroneously classified the property as paddy land in the revenue records. To change the classification of the land, the petitioner has submitted Ext.P3 application.

3. On a perusal of the materials on record, it is emerges that the petitioner is the owner in possession of 28.25 Ares of land covered under Ext.P1 land tax receipt. However, Ext.P3 application pertains only to 25.42 Ares of land.

4. Heard.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Ext.P3 application was confined to 25.42 Ares on the advice of the Akshaya Centre, i.e., after setting apart 10% of the total extent of land for water conservancy measures as stipulated under the proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 27A of the Act.

6. On the other hand, the learned Senior Government Pleader objected to the manner in which the application was submitted, contending that the petitioner is obligated to submit a fresh application in respect of the entire extent of land, as per the procedure prescribed under the Rules.

7. In view of the rival submissions, it is apposite to examine Sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 27A of the Act, which reads as follows:

“(1) If any owner of an unnotified land desires to utilise such land for residential or commercial or for other purpose, he shall apply to the Revenue Divisional Officer for permission in such manner as may be prescribed.

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in any judgement, decree or order of any Court or Tribunal or any other authority, the Revenue Divisional Officer may, after considering the reports of the Village Officer concerned, pass such orders as deemed fit and proper, on such applications, ensuring that there is no disruption to the free flow of water to the neighbouring paddy lands, if any, through such water conservancy measures as is deemed necessary:

Provided that, if the area of such parcel of land where the application is allowed is more than 20.2 ares, ten per cent of such land shall be set apart for water conservancy measures. (Emphasis given)

8. The proviso to sub-section (2) to Section 27A mandates that, in case where the applied land exceeds 20.2 Ares, then ten percent of the applied land must be set apart for water conservancy measures.

9. It is equally necessary to consider the procedural frame work under sub-rules (1) to (12) of Rule 12 of the Rules, which reads as follows:

“12. The procedure for permitting change in nature of unnotified lands as per Sub Section (2) of Section 27A:

(1) In the case of an application for changing the nature of unnotified land having an extent upto 20.23 Are, the application shall be in Form-6 and that in respect of land having an extent above 20.23 Are shall be in Form-7.

(2) Along with the application, sketch of such land, details regarding the plinth area of the building proposed to be constructed on said land shall be enclosed and wherein the extent of proposed land exceeds 20.23 Are, Ten percentage (10%) of the proposed land kept aside as a part of water conservancy measures shall be marked in the sketch in blue colour and the rest of the land shall be marked in red colour clearly in the sketch and a detailed plan regarding the water conservancy measures proposed to be implemented on the said 10 % land shall be included therein.

(3) Along with the said application either a demand draft of Rs.1000/- (Rupees Thousand only) in favour of said fund or proof of deposit of Rs.1000/- (Rupees Thousand only) via electronic transfer to the said fund shall be produced.

(4) Revenue Divisional Officer shall forward the applications received as per Sub Rule (1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top