SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ker) 153

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J.
Corporate Manager, CMS Schools, Diocese Of Madhya Kerala (CSI) – Petitioner 
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented By Its Secretary, General Education Department – Respondent 
WP(C) No. 3501 of 2025, WP(C) No. 3546 OF 2025, WP(C) No. 3584 Of 2025, WP(C) No. 6890 Of 2025
Decided On : 13-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For The Petitioner: Shri. George Varghese (Perumpallikuttiyil), Sri. Manu Srinath, Shri. Lijo John Thampy, Smt. Nivedita Muchilote, Shri. Riyas M.B.
For The Respondent: Smt. Princy Xavier, Sr.Government Pleader, Sri. Jacob P.Alex, Shri. V.A. Muhammed, Sri. P. Mohandas (Ernakulam), Sri. Joseph P. Alex, Shri. Manu Sankar P., Shri. Amal Amir Ali, Sri. K. Sudhinkumar, Sri. Sabu Pullan, Sri. Gokul D. Sudhakaran, Shri. R. Bhaskara Krishnan, Shri. Bharath Mohan, Dr. K.P. Satheesan (Sr.), Sri. Presad V.G.

Appointment procedures must adhere to regulations ensuring transparency and clarity to avoid disputes over seniority and qualifications.

Headnote:(A) Kerala State Education Act - Appointment Procedures and Regulations - This case pertains to the appointment of HSST Junior (Zoology) and HSST (Zoology) in different schools. The petitioner's challenge to the Government order on junior appointment is framed around seniority and appointment procedures. (Para 1-24)

(B) Court's Obligation - Schools must maintain clear appointment processes and effective seniority lists to prevent disputes between candidates. Failure to adhere to these protocols led to confusion and disputes in this case. (Paras 18, 20, 22)

Facts of the case:
The Corporate Manager of CMS Schools sought to quash the Government's order rejecting the appointment of the 5th respondent as HSST Junior and to approve the appointment of the 6th respondent instead. The struggle for appointments involved claims based on merit and prior experiences of candidates.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the Government's order, confirming that the procedures followed were legally sound and justified.

Issues: The main issues involved the legality of appointments made under Ext.P17 and the inadequacy of established seniority lists.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the appointment protocols and the order were lawful and no illegality was found in the Government's decision.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed except for one directing approval for the 6th respondent’s appointment.

Table of Content
1. overview of case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. details of appointments and claims. (Para 5 , 6 , 10)
3. claims and counterclaims regarding appointments. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 11)
4. arguments regarding appointment legality. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
5. court's analysis on appointment process. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
6. final remarks on aswathy alex's claim. (Para 24)
7. judgment conclusion and orders. (Para 25)

JUDGMENT :

N.NAGARESH, J.

All these writ petitions relate to appointment to the post of HSST Junior (Zoology) in the BMHSS, Kottayam and appointment to the post of HSST (Zoology) in BHHSS, Mavelikkara. Hence, they are heard together and disposed of by a common judgment. The parties and exhibits are referred to in this judgment as they are described/marked in W.P.(C)No.3501/2025, for convenience.

2. Corporate Manager of CMS Schools, Kottayam is the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.3501/2025. The petitioner seeks to set aside Ext.P17 order dated 18.12.2024 of the 1st respondent-State of Kerala and to direct the 4th respondent-Regional Deputy Director to approve the appointment of the 5th respondent as HSST Junior (Zoology) in BMGHSS, Kottayam with effect from 06.06.2019 and as HSST (Zoology) in BHHSS, Mavelikkara with effect from 01.06.2020.

3. W.P.(C) No.3546/2025 is filed by the 5th respondent (who is presently working as HSST under the petitioner) in W.P.(C) No.3501/2025 seeking the same relief. W.P.(C) No.3584/2025 is filed by the 6th respondent in W.P.(C) No.3501/2025 and who was appointed as HSST Junior under the petitioner, seeking to approve the appointment of the 6th respondent as HSST Junior (Zoology) from 06.06.2019 and HSST (Zoology) from 01.06.2022 in implementation of Ext.P17 order.

4. W.P.(C) No.6890/2025 has been filed by one Aswathy Alex, who is also working as HSST (Zoology) in CMS HSS, Mallappally seeking to quash order dated 10.01.2025 to the extent of refusing to approve her appointment, from 11.07.2023.

5. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.3501/2025 states that he is the Corporate Manager of CMS Schools, a corporate educational agency of CSI Madhyakerala Dioceses, Kottayam. The educational agency runs a number of Schools. When a vacancy of HSST Junior (Zoology) arose in BMHSS, Kottayam on 01.06.2017 consequent to the promotion of Smt. Elizabeth Mathew, a notification was issued. Another vacancy of HSST (Zoology) arose in BHHSS, Mavelikkara consequent to the transfer of Smt. Elizabeth Mathew, HSST (Zoology) to BMGHSS, Kottayam. Ext.P2 notification dated 15.06.2018 was published to fill up the said post.

6. The 5th respondent submitted Ext.P4 application and the 6th respondent submitted Ext.P3 application. The 5th respondent had prior experience as Guest Lecturer and Teacher in various Colleges/Schools. Selection Committee constituted had a nominee who was Additional Secretary to Government. In the interview conducted, the 5th respondent stood at rank No.1 and the 6th respondent stood at rank No.2.

7. Therefore, the 5th respondent was appointed as HSST (Zoology) in BHHSS, Mavelikkara and the 6th respondent was appointed as HSST Junior (Zoology) in BMHSS, Kottayam. While so, one Smt. Susan Goerge, HSST (Natural Science), BIGHSS, Pallom raised a claim for by- transfer appointment to the post of HSST Junior (Zoology) submitting an application dated 14.06.2019. She also claimed appointment by transfer to the post of HSST (Zoology), against the post to which the 5th respondent was appointed.

8. The 4th respondent heard the petitioner and the 6th respondent and directed the petitioner to make by- transfer appointment to the post of HSST Junior in BMGHSS, Kottayam. The 3rd respondent also considered the claim raised by Susan George for appointment to the post of HSST (Zoology) in BHHSS, Mavelikkara in which the 5th respondent was appointed. The 3rd respondent ordered by-transfer appointment against the said vacancy.

9. Though the petitioner challenged the two orders passed in favour of the sai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top