[Citation : 2011(4) RLW 3666 (SC)]
(Supreme Court)
Prithipal Singh etc. Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (Dr. Chauhan, J.)
HON'BLE P. SATHASIVAM, J.
HON'BLE DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.
Prithipal Singh etc.
Versus
State of Punjab & Anr. Etc.
Criminal Appeal Nos. 523-527 with 528 of 2009, decided on 04.11.2011
¼d½ Hkkjr dk lafo/kku] vuqPNsn 21] 22 lifBr n.M lafgrk] /kkjk 302@34 ,oa 120-[k( na-iz-la-] 1973] /kkjk 386¼M+½ & iqfyl vR;kpkj & vUos"k.k] iwNrkN ;k vU;Fkk ds nkSjku ;kruk nsuk ;k Øwj] vekuoh; rFkk viekfur djus okyk O;ogkj djuk & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & iqfyl vR;kpkj lnSo gh laoS/kkfud vkKk fo'ks"kdj vuqPNsn 21 o 22 dk mYya?kudkjh gS & euekuh fxjrkjh rFkk fujks/k ugha fd;s tk;s & iqfyl vR;kpkj dks lgu djuk fof/k ds 'kklu dk Øe'k% fouk'k ,oa {k; djus dh Lohd`fr nsus dh Js.kh esa vkrk gSA
¼in la[;k 48½
(b) Evidence Act, 1872, Sec. 133 read with Sec. 114, Illustration (b) — Evidence of accomplice not put on trial — Reliability — Held — Deposition of an accompliance in a crime who has not been made an accused/put to trial, can be relied upon, however the evidence is required to be considered with care and caution — Accompliance is a competent witness as he deposes in the Court after taking oath and there is no prohibition in any law not to act upon his deposition without corroboration. (Para 21)
Appeals dismissed.
¼[k½ lk{; vf/kfu;e] 1872] /kkjk 133 lifBr /kkjk 114 n`"VkUr ¼[k½ & lg-vijk/kh ds lk{; ij fopkj.k ugha djuk & fo'oluh;rk & vfHkfu/kkZfjr & fdlh vijk/k esa lg vijk/kh ds lk{; ij fo'okl fd;k tk ldrk gS] ftls vfHk;qDr ugha cuk;k x;k gS@fopkj.k ij ugha j[kk x;k gS fQj Hkh lk{; ij lko/kkuhiwoZd ,oa lrdZrk ls fopkj djuk gksrk gS & lg-vijk/kh ,d lk{; lk{kh gksrk gS D;ksafd og 'kiFk ysus ds i'pkr~ U;k;ky; esa lk{; nsrk gS rFkk lEiqf"V ds fcuk mlds lk{; ij dk;Zokgh ugha djus gsrq fdlh Hkh fof/k esa izfr"ks/k ugha gSA ¼in la[;k 21½
vihysa [kkfjt dhA
Prithipal Singh, Satnam Singh, Surinderpal Singh and Jasbir Singh, appellants, were convicted under Section 120-B IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for five years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- each, and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo RI for two months. These four accused/appellants were also convicted under Sections 364/34 IPC and sentenced to undergo for seven years RI and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo RI for five months.
The High Court while dismissing the Criminal Appeals filed by appellants, allowed the Criminal Revision Petition No. 323 of 2006 filed by Smt. Paramjit Kaur (PW.2), wife of the deceased, vide order dated 16.10.2007 and enhanced the sentence of the four appellants from seven years RI to imprisonment for life under Section 364 IPC.
2. Facts:
A. Shri Jaswant Singh Khalra, a human right activist, having allegiance to Shiromani Akali Dal, was alleged to have been abducted from his residential house No. 8, Kabir Park, Amritsar, on 6.9.1995 at 1.00 O’Clock. Shri Rajiv Singh (PW.15) was present in the house of Shri Khalra at the time of abduction, Kirpal Singh Randhawa (PW.7) had seen appellants, namely, Jaspal Singh, DSP, Surinderpal Singh, Jasbir Singh and Satnam Singh alongwith other accused persons rushing through Kabir Park with the deceased Jaswant Singh Khalra inside a Maruti van.
B. Smt. Paramjit Kaur (PW.2) wife of the deceased, came to her house from the University, where she was working, on being informed by Rajiv Singh (PW.15). She made a search for her husband but in vain. She made a complaint on the same day at 4.00 PM making a statement to SI Baldev Singh at Kabir Park that her husband had been kidnapped at 1.00 O’Clock by some persons in police uniform in Maruti van of white colour bearing No. DNB-5969. On the basis of the said statement, an FIR No. 72 (Ex.PA) was registered on 7.9.1995 at P.S. Islamabad, District Amritsar, at 9.30 AM under Section 365 IPC. However, no progress in investigation could be made and whereabouts of Jaswant Singh Khalra could not be known.
C. Smt. Paramjit Kaur (PW.2), wife of the deceased, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 497 of 1995 before this Court, wherein this Court vide order dated 5.11.1995 transferred the investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (hereinafter referred as `CBI’). The CBI registered R.C.No. 14/S/95/SC
Dilip K. Basu vs. State of W.B. & Ors. (AIR 1997 SC 3017 = RLW 1997(1) SC 97) 8
N.C. Dhoundial vs. Union of India & Ors. (AIR 2004 SC 1272) 8
Munshi Singh Gautam (D) & Ors. vs. State of M.P. (AIR 2005 SC 402 = RLW 2005(2) SC 209) 8
Raghubir Singh vs. State of Haryana (AIR 1980 SC 1087) 9
Gauri Shanker Sharma etc. vs. State of U.P. etc. (AIR 1990 SC 709) 10
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Shyamsunder Trivedi & Ors. ((1995) 4 SCC 262) 11
State of U.P. vs. Mohd. Naim (AIR 1964 SC 703) 12
People’s Union for Civil Liberties vs. Union of India & Anr. (AIR 2005 SC 2419) 12
Rubabbuddin Sheikh vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. ((2010) 2 SCC 200 = 2010(2) RLW 1095 (SC)) 12
Jaywant P.Sankpal vs. Suman Gholap & Ors. ((2010) 11 SCC 208) 12
Narmada Bai vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. ((2011) 5 SCC 79) 12
Eknath Shankarrao Mukkawar vs. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1977 SC 1177) 14
Nadir Khan vs. The State (Delhi Administration) (AIR 1976 SC 2205) 15
Govind Ramji Jadhav vs. State of Maharashtra ((1990) 4 SCC 718) 15
K. Pandurangan etc. vs. S.S.R. Velusamy & Anr. (AIR 2003 SC 3318) 15
Jayaram Vithoba & Anr. vs. The State of Bombay (AIR 1956 SC 146) 16
Rameshswar S/o Kalyan Singh vs. The State of Rajasthan (AIR 1952 SC 54) 18
Sarwan Singh Rattan Singh vs. State of Punjab (AIR 1957 SC 637) 18
K. Hasim vs. State of Tamil Nadu (AIR 2005 SC 128) 19
Suresh Chandra Bahri vs. State of Bihar (AIR 1994 SC 2420) 19
Chandran alias Manichan alias Maniyan & Ors. vs. State of Kerala ((2011) 5 SCC 161) 20
Laxmipat Choraria & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra (AIR 1968 SC 938) 20
Rudrappa Ramappa Jainpur & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka (AIR 2004 SC 4148) 22
State represented by Inspector of Police
Prabhu Babaji Navle vs. State of Bombay (AIR 1956 SC 51) 23
Sukhram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (AIR 1989 SC 772) 24
Madan Pal vs. State of Haryana ((2004) 13 SCC 508) 24
Koppula Jagdish alias Jagdish vs. State of A.P. ((2005) 12 SCC 425) 24
Sanichar Sahni vs. State of Bihar (AIR 2010 SC 3786) 25
Willie (William) Slaney vs. State of M.P. (AIR 1956 SC 116) 25
State of A.P. vs. Thakkidiram Reddy & Ors. (AIR 1998 SC 2702) 25
Ramji Singh & Anr. vs. State of Bihar (AIR 2001 SC 3853) 25
Lok Pal Singh vs. State of M.P. (AIR 1985 SC 891) 25
Vadivelu Thevar vs. The State of Madras (AIR 1957 SC 614) 26
Namdeo vs. State of Maharashtra ((2007) 14 SCC 150) 26
Bipin Kumar Mondal vs. State of West Bengal (AIR 2010 SC 3638) 26
B.P. Achala Anand vs. S. Appi Reddy & Anr. (AIR 2005 SC 986) 27
Mani Kumar Thapa vs. State of Sikkim (AIR 2002 SC 2920) 28
Ram Chandra & Anr. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (AIR 1957 SC 381) 28
Ashok Laxman Sohoni & Anr. vs. The State of Maharashtra (AIR 1977 SC 1319) 28
Rama Nand & Ors. vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh (AIR 1981 SC 738) 28
State of West Bengal vs. Mir Mohammad Omar & Ors. etc. etc. (AIR 2000 SC 2988) 29
Shambhu Nath Mehra vs. The State of Ajmer (AIR 1956 SC 404) 29
Sucha Singh vs. State of Punjab (AIR 2001 SC 1436 = RLW 2001(2) SC 345) 29
Sahadevan @ Sagadevan vs. State rep. by Inspector of Police, Chennai
Anant Chintaman Lagu vs. The State of Bombay (AIR 1960 SC 500) 43
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.