SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 239

AMITAVA ROY, VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Rajendra Prasad Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared
Rajendra Soni, Ms. Naina Saraf, D.P. Sharma, Virendra Dangi, Saransh Saini, Rajesh Kapoor, N.C. Sharma, Dr. Vikram Singh Nain, Arun Jain, M.F. Baig, SK Singodiya, Amol Vyas, Manjoj Pareek, AK Bajpai, Akhil Simlote, Anand Sharma, S.L. Sharma, R.N. Sharma, Tanveer Ahmed, Govind Choudhary, R.P. Saini, Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Umesh Kumar Sharma, Arvind Chawla, Kuldeep Verma, Pradeep Ashthana, N.K. Garg, for Petitioners;
G.S. Bapna, Sr. Advocate & Advocate General with Sarvesh Jain and V. Garg, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, Senior Advocate with Gaurav Sharma, Virendra Lodha, Senior Advocate with Nitish Bagri, Ganesh Meena, Government Counsel, Mohd. Rahil & Sahir Hussain on behalf of N.A. Naqvi, AAG, Ilesh Jindal, C.P. Sharma, Mahesh Chand Gupta, Anant Bhandari, Deputy Govt. Counsel, Ankit Jain, Bharat Vyas, Sanjay Rahar, Rupin Kala, Dinesh Yadav, AAG, Sarvesh Jain on behalf of S.N. Kumawat, AAG, for Respondents

Hon'ble SIRADHANA, J.—In these writ applications, petitioners have challenged the vires of Rule 2(g) of the Rajasthan Voluntary Rural Education Service Rules, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as 'Rules of 2010'). Since the issue raised is identical in all the writ petitions, therefore, these petitions were heard together for the purpose of common adjudication in order to answer the question raised.

2. The essential facts for adjudication of the controversy as pleaded in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16285/2010 (Rajendra Prasad Sharma & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) are that the petitioners are confirmed employees of Chirawa Senior Secondary School, Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu, selected by the duly constituted Selection Committee, including a nominee of the Government, and are working against sanctioned non-aided posts. It is further stated that the petitioners have unblemished service record and have been drawing salary in accordance with the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions (Recognition, Grant-in-aid and Service Conditions etc.) Rules, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules of 1993'), framed under the Rajasthan Non-Government Educational Institutions Act, 198

































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top