MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, SAMEER JAIN
Sunita Meena D/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Meena – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur through its Registrar General – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, J.
1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, an aspiring candidate for appointment on the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate in the Rajasthan Judicial Services, has challenged the legality and validity of the merit list prepared category-wise after preliminary examinations and published vide notice dated 11.01.2022, as also her non-inclusion by giving benefit of horizontal reservation as widow in ST category. The alternative ground, on which the petition rests, is that as the marks obtained by the petitioner are higher than the cut-off marks in the general category by operating horizontal reservation for widow, applying the rule of migration of the reserved category candidate by virtue of merit into general category, the petitioner was entitled to be placed in the merit list of the general (widow).
2. An advertisement was issued on 22.07.2021 by respondents inviting applications for appointment on 120 posts of Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate in the Raja
Anil Kumar Gupta vs. State of U.P. (1995) 5 SCC 173
B. Ramakichenin alias Balagandhi vs. Union of India and Others
Chattar Singh and Others vs. State of Rajasthan and Others
Madan Lal and Others vs. State of J&K and Others
Manish Kumar Shahi vs. State of Bihar and Others
Om Prakash Shukla vs. Akhilesh Kumar Shukla
Ramjit Singh Kardam vs. Sanjeev Kumar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.