SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 847

SANDEEP MEHTA, FARJAND ALI
Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Bhartendu Gaur S/o Shri Dev Saran – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Muktesh Maheshwari.
For the Respondent: S.K. Malik.

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP MEHTA, J.

1. These three writ petitions involve common questions of facts and law and hence, the same have been heard and are being decided together by this single judgment.

2. The Union of India, Ministry of Defence, has approached this Court through these writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for questioning legality of order dated 10.01.2020, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3840/2021 (Union of India and Others vs. Bhartendu Gaur), order dated 20.12.2019, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3857/2021 (Union of India and Others vs. LRs. of Sampat Lal Chhimpa) and order dated 10.01.2020, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3847/2021 (Union of India and Others vs. Bharat Kumar and Others), passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bench Jodhpur, accepting the original applications filed by the respondents.

3. Brief facts relevant and essential for disposal of the writ petitions are noted herein-below:

Details of appointment and promotion of the respondents under the respondent-The Commander Works Engineer (Air Force), Bikaner, are mentioned herein

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top