JUDGMENT

1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the transfer order dated 12.10.2022 by which the petitioner who is working on the post of A.En. has been transferred from Jhalawar to Ajmer in the interest of corporation.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that wife of the petitioner is also working at Kota. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has been transferred within one year. Counsel further submits that by the impugned transfer the family of the petitioner will be disturbed.

3. Counsel for the respondents opposed the writ petition. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Union of India and Anr. v. Deepak Niranjan Pandit and Anr. reported in (2020) 3 Supreme Court Cases 404 in para Nos. 3 and 4 has held as under:-

"3.The High Court, in interfering with the order of transfer, has relied on two circumstances. Firstly, the High Court has noted that as a result of the stay on the order of transfer, the headquarters of the respondent will remain at Mumbai and even if he is to be suspended, his headquarters will continue to remain at Mumbai. The second reason, which was weighed with the High Cour