Back
INDERJEET SINGH
Anurag Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Maharashtra – Respondent
ORDER
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
1. That the impugned transfer order dated 23.01.2019 and the consequential relieving order dated 21.12.2019 may kindly be declared arbitrary and accordingly be quashed and set aside.
2. Any other appropriate order, which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioner.
3. Cost of writ petition may be awarded in favour of the petitioner."
2. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 23.01.2019 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Zonal Office, Jaipur Region to Zonal Office, Mumbai Region.
3. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that there was no administrative exigency in transfer of the petitioner, moreover the transfer order was passed on 23.01.2019 whereas the consequential relieving order was passed after a delay of eleven months on 21.12.2019. Counsel further submits that even after passing of the transfer order, the petitioner
Employees do not possess a right to remain at a specific posting, and transfer orders are subject to the employer's discretion unless proven otherwise.
Government servants have no vested right to remain posted at a place of their choice, and courts are reluctant to interfere with transfers unless there is a violation of statutory provisions or mala ....
Government employees do not have a vested right to remain posted at a particular place, and interference with transfer orders is limited to specific grounds.
An employee cannot claim to serve at a particular place of his choice, and the court's interference with transfer orders is limited to cases of violation of statutory provisions or mala fides.
Government servants have no vested right to remain posted at a particular place, and interference with transfer orders should be limited to cases of mala fides or violation of specific provisions.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of the employer's discretion for better administration in employee transfers, and the limited scope of judicial review under Arti....
Government servants have no vested right to remain posted at a place of their choice, and interference with transfer orders should be limited to cases of mala fides or violation of specific provision....
Government servants have no vested right to remain posted at a place of their choice and can be transferred in administrative exigencies. Interference with transfer orders should be limited to cases ....
Judicial review of transfer orders is limited; transfers are inherent to service unless proven otherwise.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
