SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1591

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Dinesh Mehta, J.
Ashish – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3195/2022
Decided On : 06-07-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ravinder Kumar Charan, Advocate, for the Petitioner
Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP, for the Respondent

The court emphasized the importance of fair and transparent investigation as per the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and relevant Supreme Court judgments.

Headnote:

Investigation - Criminal Procedure - The court directed the concerned authorities to ensure fair investigation in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure and relevant Supreme Court judgments.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a petition alleging lack of effective investigation despite the filing of a first information report against the accused.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the concerned authorities to conduct a fair and transparent investigation upon the petitioner's submission of relevant documents, in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure and relevant Supreme Court judgments.

Issues: Alleged lack of effective investigation despite the filing of a first information report.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and relevant Supreme Court judgments to direct the authorities to ensure a fair investigation.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with a direction to the concerned authorities to consider the petitioner's representation and ensure fair investigation in accordance with the law.

JUDGMENT

1. The present misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner raising a grievance that despite first information report having been lodged against the accused, no effective steps have been taken with regard to investigation of the matter.

2. While informing that charge-sheet has not been filed so far, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that respondent - State be directed to fairly conduct the investigation and file charge-sheet in the case.

3. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the prayer made by the petitioner-complainant, this Court is of the view that the petitioner must proceed under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure as laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. : 2008 (2) SCC 409, wherein Hon'ble the Supreme Court has laid down as under :

      "15.Section 156(3) provides for a check by the Magistrate on the police performing its duties under Chapter XII Cr.P.C. In cases where the Magistrate finds that the police has not done its duty of investigating the case at all, or has not done it satisfactorily, he can issue a direction to the police to do the investigation properly, and can monitor the same.

      30. It may be further mentioned that in view of Section 36 Cr.P.C. if a person is aggrieved that a proper investigation has not been made by the officer-in-charge of the concerned police station, such aggrieved person can approach the Superintendent of Police or other police officer superior in rank to the officer-in-charge of the police station and such superior officer can, if he so wishes, do the investigation vide CBI v. State of Rajasthan and another 2001 (3) SCC 333 (vide para 11), etc. Also, the State Government is competent to direct the Inspector General, Vigilance to take over the investigation of a cognizable offence registered at a police station vide State of Bihar v. A.C. Saldanna (supra)."

      4. Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that fair and transparent investigation shall be made and in case the petitioner- complainant submits a representation along with all the relevant documents before the concerned Court or Superintendent of Police within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered appropriately.

      5. The present misc. petition is thus, disposed of with direction to the concerned Court/Superintendent of Police to consider petitioner's representation (if filed) and ensure fair investigation, in accordance with law as has been held by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu (supra).

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top