SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1047

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Bastimal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rakesh Arora, Advocate, Anees Bhurat, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.202/2021, Police Station Deogarh, District Rajsamand, for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 302 & 34 of IPC.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that similarly situated co-accused Gopi Lal and Mahaveer Lal both have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the case of the present petitioner is similar to the co-accused. Counsel further submits that all the four eye-witnesses namely Gotu Lal (PW-1), Kastor (PW-2), Suresh (PW-3) and Mema Devi (PW-4) have been examined before the trial Court and they have not supported the prosecution story and turned hostile. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody since 04.05.2021 and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

5. Having regard to the totality

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top