SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1316

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Bhavishya Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rakesh Matoria, Advocate, Mohd. Javed Gauri, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.213/2021, Police Station Kotwali Sri Ganganagar, Distt. Sri Ganganagar for the offence under Sections 302, 396, 397, 34, 120-B of IPC and Section 27 of arms act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the name of the present petitioner was not mentioned in the FIR. He was also not found present in the CCTV footage obtained by the police. The only allegation against the present petitioner is that he made reki of the area surrounding the spot of incident prior to the incident. The allegation of using firearm is against main accused-Mohit. Challan of the case has already been presented and no investigation is pending. The petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top