SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2754

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Bhim Godara @ Bhimsen – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rakesh Matoria, Advocate, N.S. Bhati, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.03/2022 Police Station Raisinghnagar, District Sri Ganganagar for the offence punishable under Sections 392, 458, 34 of the IPC and Section 3/25(1-B)(A), 5/27 of Arms Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no one has been injured in this case and he has already been discharged of the offence under Section 397 IPC. Counsel further submits that now complainant has been examined before the Court as PW-1 and there are material contradictions, improvements and omissions in his statement. The petitioner is in the judicial custody since 03.01.2022 and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top