SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1875

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Lalit Sankhla – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.S.Gour, Advocate, R.S.Choudhary, Advocate, Shrawan Bishnoi, Advocate, Harshil Vyas, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14a(2) SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.300/2021, Police Station Soorsagar , Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 143, 323, 452, 308 of IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(Va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the order dated 25.01.2022 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) Cases, Jodhpur whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

2. Heard. Perused the material available on record.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the incident occurred on a trivial issue. The injuries suffered by Bhakar Ram are on non vital parts. The appellant is suffering the incarceration for last more than one month.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the bail.

5. Thus, having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that the appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top