Back
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Parwati Devi – Appellant
Versus
Director – Respondent
ORDER
Anoop Kumar Dhand, J. - A challenge in the instant petition has been made by the petitioners to the order dated 19.08.2021 passed by Central Administrative Tribunbal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur (for short 'the Tribunal') in Original Application No.291/431/2017 whereby the Tribunal dismissed the original application filed by them.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the husband of the petitioner No.1, Mool Singh was working on the post of 'Darban', expired on 19.05.2003. The petitioner No.1 approached the concerned authorities for seeking compassionate appointment for the son i.e. the petitioner No.2 Hazari Lal. While considering pertitioners case by the respondents, they were informed vide letter/order dated 05/12.04.2005 about the ban on direct recruitment on Group "C" and "D" posts. Therafter again, the petitioner No.2 submitted a representation dated 19.09.2005 with the same request to the respondent No.3 and again on 13.06.2006, the respondents- authorities informed the petitioners that no post in Group "C" is vacant and denied appointment to the petitioner No.2 Hazari Lal and vide order dated 04/05.10.2006, issued under the signature of Administrative Officer Gr. I, Office of Ge
Compassionate appointment cannot be claimed as a matter of right after a certain period, and the purpose is to mitigate the hardship due to the death of the breadwinner in the family.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
