SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1912

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Devendra Kachhawaha, J.
Tarun Mali S/o Likhmaram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 66 of 2022
Decided On : 03-02-2022

Advocates appeared:
Manvendra Bhat, Advocate, A.R. Choudhary, Advocate, Ravindra Khichi, Advocate

Headnote:

Bail Application - Section 439 Cr.P.C. - The court allowed the bail application of the accused-petitioner based on the circumstances of the case, including the agreement of sale, illness of the petitioner's father, absence of pending investigation or recovery against the accused, and the expected lengthy trial.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with an FIR for offenses under the Indian Penal Code and the I.T. Act. The petitioner claimed innocence and cited various grounds for bail, including the illness of his father and the absence of pending investigation or recovery against him.

Finding of the Court:

The court, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, granted bail to the petitioner based on the circumstances, including the agreement of sale, illness of the petitioner's father, absence of pending investigation or recovery against the accused, and the expected lengthy trial.

Issues: Bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the circumstances of the case, including the agreement of sale, illness of the petitioner's father, absence of pending investigation or recovery against the accused, and the expected lengthy trial, in granting bail to the petitioner.

Final Decision: The bail application of the petitioner was allowed, and it was ordered that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court.

JUDGMENT

Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, as per guidelines, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts, therefore, hearing of the matter is being taken up only through video conferencing.

2. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.290/2021, Police Station Marwar Junction, District Pali, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 384 & 354 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the I.T. act.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing and learned Public Prosecutor, present-in-person. Perused the material available on record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that one agreement in regard to sale of a property has been exhibited between Pushpa Devi, mother of the complainant and Lakhma Ram, father of the petitioner; amount of sale consideration is Rs. 22,00,000/- and Rs. 12,00,000/- have been paid at the time of execution of agreement and remaining amount has to be paid before 31.12.2019 but, the same has not been paid by complainant side; petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case; mobile number mentioned in the FIR belongs to co-accused Deepak and not to the petitioner; petitioner is behind the bars since 17.12.2021; father of the petitioner is suffering from cancer disease; no investigation or recovery is pending against the petitioner; and trial will take time. With these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the petitioner.

5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioner and stated that some objectionable photographs of the complainant have allegedly been uploaded on Instagram by the accused-petitioner which has defamed the complainant victim 'P'.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly looking to the Hindi translation copy of the agreement of sale executed between the parties which is filed by learned counsel for the petitioner; illness of the father of the accused-petitioner; accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 17.12.2021; no investigation or recovery is pending against the accused-petitioner; and trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner, Tarun Mali S/o Likhmaram, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.290/2021, Police Station Marwar Junction, District Pali, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each (one surety shall be a local) to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top