SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 831

High Court of Madhya Pradesh
S. A. Dharmadhikari, J.
MONU @ KATLE @ IRFAN - APPELLANT
Versus
STATE OF M. P. - RESPONDENT
M. Cr. C. No. 5459 of 2021
Decided On : 02-02-2021

Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant : Sushil Goswami
For Respondent: Bhanu Pratap

Prolonged pre-trial detention is against the concept of liberty and can be a basis for granting bail.

Headnote:

Bail - Criminal Procedure Code - Section 439, Indian Penal Code - Sections 307, 294, 34, 427, Arms Act - Sections 25/27 - Summary of the acts and sections referenced and discussed by the court.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant filed a bail application under section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code for grant of bail. The applicant had been arrested in connection with various offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court, considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, extended the benefit of bail to the applicant, emphasizing that prolonged pre-trial detention is against the concept of liberty.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the charges against him and the delay in trial due to COVID-19.

Ratio Decidendi: The court decided to grant bail to the applicant based on the prolonged pre-trial detention being against the concept of liberty and the likelihood that the trial would not conclude in the near future.

Final Decision: The application for bail was allowed, and the applicant was directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and complying with specific conditions.

ORDER/JUDGMENT – Shri Sushil Goswami, Advocate for the applicant.

    Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Public Prosecutor for the respondent/ State.

    2. In pursuance of the directions issued by the Apex Court and guidelines issued by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in the wake of COVID-19 outbreak, the matter was taken up through video conferencing while adhering to the norms of social distancing prescribed by the Government.

    3. I. A. No. 3014/2020, an application for urgent hearing is considered and allowed.

    4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

    5. Case diary perused.

    6. The applicant has filed this fourth application under section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code for grant of bail. First application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dt. 6-1-2020 passed in M. Cr. C. No. 53508/2019. Second and third applications were dismissed on merits vide orders dt. 13-3-2020 and 22-7-2020 passed in M. Cr. C. No. 11296/2020 and M. Cr. C. No. 18440/2020 respectively.

    7. The applicant has been arrested on 18-11-2019 by Police Station Lahar, District – Bhind (M.P.), in connection with Crime No. 367/2019 registered in relation to the offences punishable under sections 307, 294 and 34 of Indian Penal Code and added section 427 of Indian Penal Code and sections 25/27 of the Arms Act.

    8. Prosecution story, in short, is that on 14-11-2019, at about 2 AM while the complainant was returning home and was passing by Sneh Nagar Colony, co-accused-Yogendra Singh @ Pappu, armed with a 2 gun, co-accused Dheerendra Singh with stone, and co-accused Chhotu Singh with a gun and present applicant Monu Katle Khan with a country made pistol, who were waiting since before, shouted to stop the vehicle. When complainant did not stop, the co-accused Dhirendra pelted a stone which fell on Driver side of the vehicle causing crack in its window pane. Co-accused-Yogendra Singh not only filthily abused and exhorted to kill, but also with an intention to kill, fired at the complainant which hit at driver’s gate. Besides, present applicant Monu Katle and co-accused Chhotu Rajput also fired from behind. The incident was witnessed by Brajendra Singh and Vijay Pratap Singh Rajawat who were sitting in the vehicle.

    9. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. Applicant is in custody since 18-11-2019. It is submitted that charge-sheet has been filed and no further custodial interrogation is required in the matter. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant claims party with Yogendra @ Pappu who has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 11-1-2021 passed in M.Cr.C. No. 50800/2020. The witnesses are not turning up and there is delay in trial due to COVID 19. Charges have not been framed, therefore, applicant cannot be kept in jail for an indefinite period. Counsel for the applicant submits that in view of COVID-19, outbreak detention of applicant in already congested prisons may be detrimental. Applicant is a permanent resident of District Bhind and there is no likelihood of his absconsion or tampering with the prosecution evidence and he is ready to abide by the terms and conditions as may be imposed. With the aforesaid submissions, prayer for grant of bail is made.

    10. Learned Public Prosecutor for the State opposed the application and prays for its rejection contending that on the basis of the allegations and the material available on record, no case for grant of bail is made out.

    11. However, it would not be desirable to enter into the merits of the rival contentions at this juncture.

    12. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the fact that trial is not likely to conclude in near future and prolonged pre-trial detention being an anathema to the concept of liberty, this Court is inclined to extend the benefit of bail to the applicant.

    13. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant be

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top