Back
S. A. DHARMADHIKARI
MONU @ KATLE @ IRFAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
ORDER/JUDGMENT – Shri Sushil Goswami, Advocate for the applicant.
Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Public Prosecutor for the respondent/ State.
2. In pursuance of the directions issued by the Apex Court and guidelines issued by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in the wake of COVID-19 outbreak, the matter was taken up through video conferencing while adhering to the norms of social distancing prescribed by the Government.
3. I. A. No. 3014/2020, an application for urgent hearing is considered and allowed.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
5. Case diary perused.
6. The applicant has filed this fourth application under section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code for grant of bail. First application was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dt. 6-1-2020 passed in M. Cr. C. No. 53508/2019. Second and third applications were dismissed on merits vide orders dt. 13-3-2020 and 22-7-2020 passed in M. Cr. C. No. 11296/2020 and M. Cr. C. No. 18440/2020 respectively.
7. The applicant has been arrested on 18-11-2019 by Police Station Lahar, District – Bhind (M.P.), in connection with Crime No. 367/2019 registered in relation to the offences punishable under sections 307, 294 and 34 of Indian
Prolonged pre-trial detention is against the concept of liberty and can be a basis for granting bail.
The court considered the circumstances, including the absence of grievous injuries and the compromise between the parties, in granting bail to the petitioner.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the circumstances of the case, including the filing of the charge-sheet, the grant of bail to co-accused persons, and the expected lengthy trial d....
The court considered the circumstances of the case, including the nature of the offense, the petitioner's time in custody, and the expected trial duration, in granting bail.
Offence of Abetment - Bail Application - Basic jurisprudence relating to bail remains the same inasmuch as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception so as to ensure that, the accused....
The court considered the prolonged custody, absence of injury, and expected lengthy trial period in allowing the bail application.
Criminal Trial - Bail Application - Basic jurisprudence relating to bail remains the same inasmuch as the grant of bail is the rule and refusal is the exception so as to ensure that, the accused has ....
Search and Seizer of illicit wine/liquor - Grant of bail - Having no criminal history.
The absence of the applicant's name in the complainant's statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. and in the FIR, and the length of time the applicant had been in custody, were key factors in ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
