SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1991

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Kalu Ram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Prakash Chandra, Advocate, Shrawan Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.241/2020, Police Station Sujangarh, District Churu for the offences under Sections 399 & 402 of IPC and Section 4/25 of arms act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. The first bail application of the petitioner was rejected by this Court on 22.04.2021 with liberty to file fresh bail application in the month of august, 2021.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge-sheet in the case has been filed and the petitioner has already suffered incarceration since august, 2020. The conclusion of trial will take sufficient long time, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

5. The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, the opinion that the bail application filed by deserves to be accepted. of the case and this Court is of the petitioner Consequently, the present second bail app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top