HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Rameshwar Vyas, J.
Sunil @ Sonu @ Sonpuri – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1052 of 2021
Decided On : 25-02-2022
Bail - SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act - Delay in filing FIR - Grant of bail based on delay in filing FIR and age of the prosecutrix
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 14-a SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the rejection of his bail application in connection with F.I.R. No. 116/2021 for offenses under IPC and SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act.
Finding of the Court:
The Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, granted bail to the appellant based on the delay in filing the FIR and the age of the prosecutrix.
Issues: Delay in filing the FIR, age of the prosecutrix, and grant of bail under SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court deemed it just and proper to grant bail to the appellant based on the delay in filing the FIR and the age of the prosecutrix.
Final Decision: The instant appeal was allowed, and the impugned order rejecting the bail application was set aside. The accused-appellant was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and sureties.
JUDGMENT
Rameshwar Vyas, J. - The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14-a SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 116/2021 registered at Women Police Station, Barmer for the offences under Sections 354-D, 384, 376(2)N of IPC and Section 3(1)(?)(ii), 3(2) (v), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the order dated 26.10.2021 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act Cases, Barmer whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the prosecutrix is major married lady, who lodged the report in police after one year of the alleged incident. Prosecutrix has not furnished any explanation for such inordinate delay. allegation of committing rape upon the prosecution by the petitioner is false. He further submits that there were relations between the parties. after investigation, challan has already been filed. appellant is behind the bars since 12.7.2021. Trial is not likely to be concluded in near future. In the above, circumstances, learned counsel for the appellant prays that the appeal filed by the appellant deserves to be allowed.
3. On the contrary, learned counsel for the complainant and learned Public Prosecutor have opposed the appeal.
4. Having regard to the rival contentions of the learned counsel for the parties and after perusal of the material available on record, in the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly looking to the fact of delay in filing the FIR and the age of the prosecutrix, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant the bail to the appellant.
5. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 26.10.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of atrocties) act Cases, Barmer is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant, Sunil @ Sonu @ Sonpuri S/o Shri Kishan Puri arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.116/2021 registered at Women Police Station, Barmer shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 50,000/-each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the fact that star witnesses had turned hostile, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
The court established that in cases involving multiple accused, the presence of no direct allegations against an individual can be a significant factor in granting bail.
The severity of the alleged offence and the likelihood of a prolonged trial are relevant factors in deciding whether to grant bail.
The court may grant bail to an appellant under the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act based on the circumstances and the bail granted to similarly situated co-accused, without expressing any opinio....
Granting bail based on length of custody, filing of charge sheet, and absence of criminal antecedents without expressing opinion on the merits of the case.
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the consideration of the entirety of facts and circumstances available on record, highlighting the importance of a thorough review of the case before m....
The court established that inconsistencies in a victim's testimony can significantly impact the decision to grant bail, reinforcing the principle of presumption of innocence in criminal proceedings.
The court established that the age of the prosecutrix and the completion of the investigation are significant factors in determining bail under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.